Talk:Pair taken off plane because of "suspicious" behaviour

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The article says "the men were of Asian or Middle Eastern appearance", which sounds a little odd to me. Is this the UK use of the term "asian", which includes people from India, Pakistan, and neighbouring countries? It still seems like more of an either/or combination to me, rather than a pair of closely related racial groups. --Imroy 13:55, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Asian also includes China, Thailand, etc. You might want to brush up on your geography. 786 14:09, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The term "asian" has slightly different interpretations in different parts of the world. That's what I was trying to sort out. You might try not being a dick in the future. --Imroy 08:16, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

info box[edit]

Just wondering whether these events are becoming so frequent they are part of a continuing trend deserving an infobox? "Airplane disruptions" or something like that? Maybe not, just wondering about it. Neutralizer 15:23, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I think its pretty funny if category terrorism fills up with false allerts. Or you could make a seperate histeria infobox.

renaming[edit]

was not a good idea:

  1. it came too late.
  2. "incident was racist" is pov, the security authorities wld almost cerainly deny it.

Doldrums 13:55, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It was a good idea:

  1. I noticed the POV title only recently.
  2. The relevant authorities say-"Patrick Mercer, a homeland security spokesman for the Conservative Party, told the Mail on Sunday today: "For those unfortunate two men to be victimised because of the colour of their skin is just nonsense.".

If you wish, I will unpublish and we can discuss this issue further. Till then I will revert your edit. Thanks. PVJ(Talk) 14:30, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

published articles shldn't be changed "long after" publication (threshold has been 2 days), except to issue corrections. Mercer is a spokesman for a political patry, and as such, his views do not necessarily become uncontested truth - it's just one pov, and as i said earlier, one which will be denied by the security folks. i see no reason to highlight this one view in the title. Doldrums 14:39, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

New edit[edit]

Category:Aviation required, please. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 11:51, 20 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]