Talk:World Economic Forum security chief found dead on eve of summit
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The headline should say that it was security chief of World economic form. no one knows where Davos is/significance of Davos. Bawolff ☺☻ 23:42, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
- Really? The forum is very commonly referred to as just 'Davos': try searching 'World Economic Forum' on Google news [1]. Plus writing it out in full makes the headline too long imho. the wub "?!" 00:06, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
- Your more familiar with the subject then i am, so do what you think is best. To me when i hear Davos, I have no idea what it is, I do roughly know what the world economic fourm is. Bawolff ☺☻ 00:12, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
- Maybe I'm just really ignorant, but I agree with Bawolff, I think it should be made more clear that it was the World Economic Forum. Tempodivalse [talk] 00:27, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
- When I first saw it, I thought it was Davros!!! Cirt (talk) 00:32, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
- I did double check when I wrote it, I've actually made that mistake before! the wub "?!" 00:36, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
- Ok, done. That's what I was originally going to use anyway. the wub "?!" 00:33, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
- When I first saw it, I thought it was Davros!!! Cirt (talk) 00:32, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
- Maybe I'm just really ignorant, but I agree with Bawolff, I think it should be made more clear that it was the World Economic Forum. Tempodivalse [talk] 00:27, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
- Your more familiar with the subject then i am, so do what you think is best. To me when i hear Davos, I have no idea what it is, I do roughly know what the world economic fourm is. Bawolff ☺☻ 00:12, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
Review of revision 945177 [Passed][edit]
Revision 945177 of this article has been reviewed by Cirt (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 00:34, 27 January 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 945177 of this article has been reviewed by Cirt (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 00:34, 27 January 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |