User talk:William S. Saturn

Welcome to the talk page for William S. Saturn. Click here to begin a new section.

• Archives:
• User talk:William S. Saturn/2008
• User talk:William S. Saturn/2009
• User talk:William S. Saturn/2010
• User talk:William S. Saturn/2011

On the campaign trail, December 2011

I enjoyed this.

There were several details in one bit that I failed to adequately corroborate, which I noted in the review comments. --Pi zero (talk) 09:58, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for the review. See between 10:23 and 11:00 of http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2QspuRWVRx4&feature=related for Terry's statement that he plans to write himself in, followed by Supreme's statement that he would as well.--William S. Saturn (talk) 17:58, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Rocky Anderson

Hi! I figured you'd want to know I've nommed your (fantastic) interview with Rocky Anderson at WN:FAC. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 01:08, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for that.--William S. Saturn (talk) 04:46, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Herman Cain endorses Newt Gingrich for US president

Just thought I'd point out this article, as possibly relevant On the campaign trail. --Pi zero (talk)

Thank you for the heads up.--William S. Saturn (talk) 06:15, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

On the campaign trail, January 2012

I've failed to find some things, noted on the talk page (what I've failed to find so far, anyway). Wondering if some emails to scoop could have been lost (e.g., during the move of wikinewsie.org from godaddy to its new home — in the Netherlands, I think). --Pi zero (talk) 19:15, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Two additional questions. --Pi zero (talk) 22:15, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

My apologies on this. Next time I'll make sure I list all the sources before asking for a review.--William S. Saturn (talk) 22:42, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

A thought. Last month as I recall, you had lists of sources per section on the talk page. That was extremely helpful; the links didn't necessarily matter, since I always load all the sources into browser tabs early in a review and keep them all till the end, but identifying which sources to look in for each section made review much easier. I think I meant to say so in my review comments, but then by the end of the review it slipped my mind. (Another technique Brian McNeil has sometimes used with long articles is to put html comments after each passage naming the source that verifies it.) --Pi zero (talk) 22:54, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Yes. I will do that again next time.--William S. Saturn (talk) 23:03, 2 February 2012 (UTC)