Comment Do you intend to actually contribute? All I see is one edit, to ask for credentials. And, you specify "reviews" as an area of interest. Had you read our policies, you know reviews are not permitted. --Brian McNeil / talk 03:56, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
I offered a little friendly coaching about helping 'round the house here first......let's see how xe responds. I'll reserve my vote for a couple more days. .....let's see where this goes. Bddpaux (talk) 18:45, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
CommentMove to close at this late hour.Bddpaux (talk) 19:51, 30 March 2012 (UTC)
Oppose You joined in January, have done one edit (asking for accreditation). This is a wiki, meaning a sense of community is important. You give a little, you take a little....that's how it works here. This totally reeks of some marketing-person-pseudo-tabloid-wannabee just wanting something to get them in the side door at various press events. Give to the project, and maybe ask again in a few months. Bddpaux (talk) 21:38, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
and here we are, two months after xe joined.....no further edits, no grammar patrol, has done no household chores here.....nothing. Move along. Nothing to see here.Bddpaux (talk) 03:25, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
Oppose In a lighter response, it'd be a helpful for you to be a more active member of the community before requesting accreditation. Sarah (talk) 23:45, 25 March 2012 (UTC)
Oppose Wikinews operates on accumulated reputation; see WN:Never assume. Our reputation as a project is, in turn, behind our accreditation, and we're not going to do that for someone who has no reputation for us to judge. Applicant has shown no interest at all in the project, therefore clearly would not be a reasonable person for us to entrust with our accreditation. --Pi zero (talk) 00:02, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.