Category talk:Yahoo!
Add topicLatest comment: 6 years ago by Pi zero
{{editprotected}}
The name should be "Yahoo!" and not "Yahoo".
acagastya PING ME! 12:49, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
- I agree, @Pi zero:, will a simple rename of the category break the archives? I am not sure, so I didn't do it, yet. --SVTCobra 23:05, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
- @SVTCobra: Alas, it's not so easy. Really large categories are such a pain that we mostly defer them to some unknown future date when we can bring semi-automation to bear on them. This one isn't quite that big, though not trivial either; I might tackle it late tonight if I manage to get through the pending review and still have a bit of energy left. --Pi zero (talk) 23:31, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
- So renaming the category would not let the old archived articles through, if I understand you correctly? There once was a bot that I used for some tasks. It wouldn't save edits. The operator had to OK each of the changes, and could edit them before save. I've been racking my mind, but I can't for the life of me remember what it was called. --SVTCobra 23:41, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
- It's
Done. --Pi zero (talk) 23:48, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- It's
- So renaming the category would not let the old archived articles through, if I understand you correctly? There once was a bot that I used for some tasks. It wouldn't save edits. The operator had to OK each of the changes, and could edit them before save. I've been racking my mind, but I can't for the life of me remember what it was called. --SVTCobra 23:41, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
- @SVTCobra: Alas, it's not so easy. Really large categories are such a pain that we mostly defer them to some unknown future date when we can bring semi-automation to bear on them. This one isn't quite that big, though not trivial either; I might tackle it late tonight if I manage to get through the pending review and still have a bit of energy left. --Pi zero (talk) 23:31, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
