Comments:Canadian scientists protest Harper's attacks on science
This page is for commentary on the news. If you wish to point out a problem in the article (e.g. factual error, etc), please use its regular collaboration page instead. Comments on this page do not need to adhere to the Neutral Point of View policy. You should sign your comments by adding ~~~~ to the end of your message. Please remain on topic. Though there are very few rules governing what can be said here, civil discussion and polite sparring make our comments pages a fun and friendly place. Please think of this when posting.
Quick hints for new commentators:
- Use colons to indent a response to someone else's remarks
- Always sign your comments by putting --~~~~ at the end
- You can edit a section by using the edit link to the right of the section heading
"If Canada had proportional representation like in many EU countries then yes they would have the right, but Canada has an outdated system that doesn't allow the most popular party to rule properly."
No because the conservatives did not win with a majority.... Having only 30 something percent support means that the majority of canadians do not support the conservatives —Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.108.40.206 (talk) 08:23, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
PR won't help
Proportional Representation won't solve the problems with representation. The power will remain with the most populated provinces (ie Quebec and Ontario), while the Western and Maritime provinces will remain under-represented. It's ridiculous how we slash politicians for speaking their minds, granted they should do it in a respectable manner, but everytime they speak to their beliefs the public is in an uproar. If we don't like what our politicians are saying, we get to not vote for them. Hooray democracy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk) 01:33, 15 October 2008 (UTC)