Talk:'Debating with a woman is complicated' says Spanish Partido Popular EU candidate

Headline

Much too long. Though I do see the difficulty.

Also, headlines should use single quotes rather than double quotes. --Pi zero (talk) 18:11, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

I thought about the quote from the English language source, but it is not a good or exact translation. Not certain how to shorten. Will make a try. --LauraHale (talk) 18:20, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Review of revision 2625624 [Not ready]

Revision 2625624 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 22:23, 16 May 2014 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: See below. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: Didn't find anything in the cited sources about abortion, which leaves the second-to-last paragraph, except its first sentence, unsourced. I've cleared everything else in the article. However, I didn't feel comfortable, as reviewer, deleting the unverified material in order to publish, since it's such a significant fraction of the article (although near the bottom of the inverted pyramid). Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 2625624 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 22:23, 16 May 2014 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: See below. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: Didn't find anything in the cited sources about abortion, which leaves the second-to-last paragraph, except its first sentence, unsourced. I've cleared everything else in the article. However, I didn't feel comfortable, as reviewer, deleting the unverified material in order to publish, since it's such a significant fraction of the article (although near the bottom of the inverted pyramid). Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

The abortion information was pulled from the English source. It says:

"Cañetes dribble: Nerves? Anxiety? Low-self esteem?"

He was 'saved by the bell' when RTVE cut to adverts as Valenciano began to grill him on Spain’s controversial new abortion laws, which she argued the PP had shelved for the time being through fear it would affect their European election results.

"I am a mother, I have a son and a daughter, it's the best thing I've done in my life. But I decided freely. You (and your party) are trying to impose your morality. You have hidden the law, you know the people don't want it," she said.

Existing legislation allows women to opt for abortion in the first 14 weeks of pregnancy, and up to 22 weeks if the foetus is seriously deformed or if the birth poses a serious risk to the mother.

The planned reform has outraged pro-choice groups and brought thousands of people out onto the streets to protest. --62.32.239.34 (talk) 06:53, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Rod Serling should be around here somewhere. I'd have sworn I checked all the sources, including the English one, both string-searching for "abort" and reading from beginning to end. Repeatedly. <sighs> If I weren't about four hours past my bedtime, I'd check the paragraph now. --Pi zero (talk) 07:28, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Review of revision 2626702 [Passed]

Revision 2626702 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 12:42, 17 May 2014 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: If there's any lesson in this review saga, it's that after two full reviews in a day I'm more likely to make mistakes. It's a pretty muddled message, though, since rhe mistake was 'safe' by erring on the side of caution, and the article apparently wouldn't have been published sooner if I'd not addressed it then, and indeed there's a lot less to do now because I did address it then. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 2626702 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 12:42, 17 May 2014 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: If there's any lesson in this review saga, it's that after two full reviews in a day I'm more likely to make mistakes. It's a pretty muddled message, though, since rhe mistake was 'safe' by erring on the side of caution, and the article apparently wouldn't have been published sooner if I'd not addressed it then, and indeed there's a lot less to do now because I did address it then. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Image credit

{{editprotected}}

The image credit tag of the first image is not displayed correctly: the template needs the last '}'. Thanks --Trek00 (talk) 16:09, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Done --Pi zero (talk) 16:22, 16 June 2014 (UTC)