Talk:200 in New Delhi, India drink cow urine to fight off COVID-19
Add topicNotes for reviewer
[edit]There are some of the sources serving a particular function, my comment might help you know where to look and for what (because, after all: Indian media):
- JHCSSE: used for the last para: number of confirmed cases, recovered cases and deaths in India. Requires JavaScript
- Tanu Kulkarni/The Hindu: Last para: schools were closed.
- Situation report(PDF): "According to the WHO's situation report dated March 16, the virus claimed 6606 lives, and 167,515 cases were reported of this disease."
- IANS/India.com: Schools closed, second source.
- WHO(QnA): (Look for "Are there any medicines or therapies that can prevent or cure COVID-19") "While some western, traditi..."
- Translated quote is from Neelam Pandey/ThePrint. They have a transliterated version. I translated the Hindi version to English.
- The Hindu has been ranting about the need to pay for journalism. I bypassed it by disabling JavaScript. Else archived sersion also helps.
•–• 20:21, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
Would have had trouble finding the "While some western..." without that note; that page also needs javascript (otherwise there's no way to expand the answers to questions). --Pi zero (talk) 21:21, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- We do have a policy against pay-to-read sources. And sites that use that sort of javascript-based paywall clearly intend pay-to-read, which we ought to respect; I might choose not to insist, in a given instance, but it would be perfectly reasonable for a reviewer to object, and reporters should be discouraged from using such... --Pi zero (talk) 22:11, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- While typing the notes, I was thinking how this will mean I may never read The Hindu (not that I actively read it, but even when doing an internet search, I won't click it) again. I would not even use it now, and we already have poor quality of journalism here.
•–• 22:15, 17 March 2020 (UTC)
- While typing the notes, I was thinking how this will mean I may never read The Hindu (not that I actively read it, but even when doing an internet search, I won't click it) again. I would not even use it now, and we already have poor quality of journalism here.
Review of revision 4553142 [Passed]
[edit]
Revision 4553142 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:18, 17 March 2020 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 4553142 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:18, 17 March 2020 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |