Talk:2010 UK general election results

Pirate party

It seems all the election results are bad. I can't find a mention of the Pirate party for example. At the very least make a table of all the parties showing a % vote of the complete elections or something. Often they simply undemocratically mention "others". I can understand that in gallup polls, sure, but not in official election records. There's no "others" party.

Remind me, how many seats are held by the Pirate Party? Oh yeah, none. Every party that won a seat is either represented or in a constituency that the table is yet to be updated for. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 16:29, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

What About Northern Ireland?

I noticed that, while a few seats have been declared for NI, only one (Belfast East) is represented in the table. --Dialh (talk) 00:29, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

We're still busy updating the tables; due to the large size of the page, editing the page is somewhat time-consuming. Please feel free to help add new results to the table. Tempodivalse [talk] 00:33, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Broadcast report

Most of the information used in this article was gained from the live BBC1 broadcast of the election results on the night of 6–7 May 2010, which I and a number of other users on IRC watched. Δενδοδγε _τ\^c 22:18, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Review of revision 1013210 [Passed]

Revision 1013210 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 22:22, 6 May 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Slightly unusual, but several of us in IRC agreed publishing and updating through the night was a good idea. We'll split the blame ;) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1013210 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 22:22, 6 May 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Slightly unusual, but several of us in IRC agreed publishing and updating through the night was a good idea. We'll split the blame ;) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Votes?

For the votes column, is it the votes overall in the constituency or only the votes for the winning party?--Dialh (talk) 02:43, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

For the winner. --Mikemoral♪♫ 02:43, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Table

{{editprotected}}
Votes and share % are switched in some entries. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.185.43.103 (talk • contribs) 21:44, 30 July 2010

Crikey, yes! A sysop with a few minutes to spare should call by, check, and fix all this. --InfantGorilla (talk) 06:13, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

• Done — Fixed, alone with other formatting errors (inconsistent use of comma dividers, missing percent signs). I'm disappointed that this was missed in review. Gopher65_talk 13:34, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Category request

{{editprotected}}

Please add Category:Somerset. Thanks, Rodw (talk) 12:08, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

• NOT DONE. This covers the entire UK, it would be meaningless and useless to make this change as every single district in the UK would, by your logic, also have to be added as a categorisation. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 12:29, 30 November 2010 (UTC)