Talk:Australia's New South Wales Fire Brigades in crisis over bullying
Add topicReview of revision 1041909 [Failed]
[edit]  |
Revision 1041909 of this article has been reviewed by Microchip08 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 10:19, 11 June 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Use only one blank line after each paragraph. I don't know what the NSW, or the KPMH, is without clicking further; this should be information that is in the article. You haven't filled the sources in correctly: please fill in as many fields as possible. The author is the person that wrote the article; the publisher is generally the website's official name. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 1041909 of this article has been reviewed by Microchip08 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 10:19, 11 June 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Use only one blank line after each paragraph. I don't know what the NSW, or the KPMH, is without clicking further; this should be information that is in the article. You haven't filled the sources in correctly: please fill in as many fields as possible. The author is the person that wrote the article; the publisher is generally the website's official name. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Review of revision 1041956 [Failed]
[edit]| |
Revision 1041956 of this article has been reviewed by Microchip08 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 11:18, 11 June 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: The article is in the Articles with broken source templates category, so something is wrong with one of the templates. Please fix this. Also, the headline needs to be more newsy. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 1041956 of this article has been reviewed by Microchip08 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 11:18, 11 June 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: The article is in the Articles with broken source templates category, so something is wrong with one of the templates. Please fix this. Also, the headline needs to be more newsy. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Review of revision 1042124 [Failed]
[edit]| |
Revision 1042124 of this article has been reviewed by Calebrw (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 20:39, 11 June 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 1042124 of this article has been reviewed by Calebrw (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 20:39, 11 June 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Review of revision 1042912 [Passed]
[edit]  |
Revision 1042912 of this article has been reviewed by Blurpeace (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 00:51, 13 June 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 1042912 of this article has been reviewed by Blurpeace (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 00:51, 13 June 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Edit
[edit]{{editprotected}} Please change "with 26% of female firefights" in the third-to-last paragraph to "with 26% of female firefighters". Heavy Water (talk) 00:46, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
