Talk:Bernie Sanders wins 2020 Nevada caucuses

Notes

• The NCSL source is included here because it is specifically mentioned ("According to the National Conference of State Legislatures..."); the content that is used from it was also used in 2020 United States presidential election: Trump, Sanders win New Hampshire primaries, which was used as a source for this article

--DannyS712 (talk) 05:50, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

Although it is referenced, the information is altogether from the cited previous Wikinews publication. So, unnecessary here. --Pi zero (talk) 22:58, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

Okay. Good to know --DannyS712 (talk) 22:58, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

Submitted

Since the official delegate counts are not released yet, to try and get this reviewed faster I'm removing the part discussing the specific vote breakdown and delegate distributions. I'll add them back once the results are published, along with another source.

{| class="wikitable floatleft"
|+ Delegate tracker
|-
! !! Iowa !! New Hampshire !! Nevada !! Total
|-
| Sanders || 12 || 9 || ? || 21+
|-
| Buttigieg || 14 || 9 || ? || 23+
|-
| Warren || 8 || || || 8
|-
| Biden || 6 || || ? || 6+
|-
| Klobuchar || 1 || 6 || ? || 7+
|-
| Total || 41 || 24 || 36 ||
|}

Sanders secured __ of Nevada's __ delegates with __% of the vote, giving him a total of __ delegates. Joe Biden came in second, with __% of the vote earning __ delegates for a running total of __. At least __ are needed to secure the party's nomination.

--DannyS712 (talk) 06:45, 23 February 2020 (UTC)

Review of revision 4548006 [Passed]

Revision 4548006 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:01, 23 February 2020 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: This is fairly light on content, of course (having been written early, which would have been less noticeable if we'd managed to review it about twelve hours ago; drat); but, quite neatly written. (Just for example, the prelim copyvio check was absolutely clean. Things like that make review go much more smoothly.) I did wonder, at first, whether the Review-Journal sufficed as corroboration for the outcome. (Obviously, I decided it did.) Re the headline: identifying Bernie by full name seems to me desirable; on the other hand, even though international readers might not recognize "Nevada", the overall nature of the story seems to me to come through from this headline, so that international readers if they couldn't deduce the specific nature of the story would reasonably still investigate far enough to get the gist from the start of the lede. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4548006 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:01, 23 February 2020 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: This is fairly light on content, of course (having been written early, which would have been less noticeable if we'd managed to review it about twelve hours ago; drat); but, quite neatly written. (Just for example, the prelim copyvio check was absolutely clean. Things like that make review go much more smoothly.) I did wonder, at first, whether the Review-Journal sufficed as corroboration for the outcome. (Obviously, I decided it did.) Re the headline: identifying Bernie by full name seems to me desirable; on the other hand, even though international readers might not recognize "Nevada", the overall nature of the story seems to me to come through from this headline, so that international readers if they couldn't deduce the specific nature of the story would reasonably still investigate far enough to get the gist from the start of the lede. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.