Talk:Claudio Bravo signs Manchester City

Review of revision 4244454 [Passed]

Revision 4244454 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:34, 28 August 2016 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4244454 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:34, 28 August 2016 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

La Liga matches

@Pi zero: Barcelona's website says He collected the Zamora Trophy for the best goalkeeping record in the Liga 2014/15 season (18 goals in 37 games). His stats the following year were not too different, with 23 goals conceded in 35 games... 37+35=72 Liga games.
acagastya 19:52, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

@Acagastya: What would account for the other three games? --Pi zero (talk) 19:59, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

You remember, Barcelona had two FIFA Club World Cup matches (I covered two matche reports). Instead of Marc-André yet Stegan, Bravo guarded the net for two matches. One in Spanish Super Cup some ten days ago when he saved a penalty against Sevilla.
acagastya 20:04, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

Incorrect Title?

The title should have been "Bravo signs for Manchester City" or "Man City signs Bravo" ... currently its other way round? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Unnited meta (talk • contribs) 03:41, 30 August 2016‎

It stands for Bravo has signed 's contact' for Manchester City.
acagastya 04:12, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

My grammar sense recognizes it as an acceptable form, regardless of whether it stands for anything else. English can play a lot of games with things like verb transitivity as well as parts of speech. (obligatory xkcd link.) --Pi zero (talk) 12:41, 30 August 2016 (UTC)