Talk:Football: Crystal Palace sacks de Boer after 77 days as manager

Review of revision 4346062 [Not ready]

Revision 4346062 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 21:04, 12 September 2017 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: See below. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: The official statement was not listed as a source in the submitted form; I moved it from External links to Sources because I'd needed it to verify when they said it (BBC, having typically forgotten that when is one of the five Ws, failed to state explicitly on what day the focal event happened). However the official statement is very thin on information, leaving an uncomfortably heavy dependence on BBC. I'm also having trouble with verification as I go along, and this further supports the possibility a source might have been left out. The things I noticed were list of Premiere League teams played, and the sentence at the end of that paragraph about Allardyce (which I wondered if could be some muddling of things about Allardyce and Hodgson). I halted verification with that paragraph, not attempting the later ones. There are clearly significant verification problems, combined with an uncomfortable shortfall of sourcing for the focal event. Please adding further sourcing, and recheck facts provided. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 4346062 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 21:04, 12 September 2017 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: See below. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: The official statement was not listed as a source in the submitted form; I moved it from External links to Sources because I'd needed it to verify when they said it (BBC, having typically forgotten that when is one of the five Ws, failed to state explicitly on what day the focal event happened). However the official statement is very thin on information, leaving an uncomfortably heavy dependence on BBC. I'm also having trouble with verification as I go along, and this further supports the possibility a source might have been left out. The things I noticed were list of Premiere League teams played, and the sentence at the end of that paragraph about Allardyce (which I wondered if could be some muddling of things about Allardyce and Hodgson). I halted verification with that paragraph, not attempting the later ones. There are clearly significant verification problems, combined with an uncomfortable shortfall of sourcing for the focal event. Please adding further sourcing, and recheck facts provided. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

bottled up while using VE. Honestly, BBC had very less dependency, which reminded me of what happened while using MediaWiki's favourite method of editing.
Agastya Chandrakant ⚽️ 🏆 🎾 🎬 🎤 📰 05:01, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

the list of teams I found in an article linked from cited source, [1]. --Pi zero (talk) 17:23, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

The Guardian has a history of removing content after publication. If it is not available directly, then let's remove that bit on information. I could find Liverpool, Swansea and Burnley. But not the other two.
acagastya PING ME! 17:30, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Review of revision 4346590 [Passed]

Revision 4346590 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 17:59, 14 September 2017 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Several structural similarities to source passages gave me pause. One I addressed. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4346590 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 17:59, 14 September 2017 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Several structural similarities to source passages gave me pause. One I addressed. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

The structure is same as those articles in the archives -- i understand the problem, but I use archived ones as the backbone.
acagastya PING ME! 18:07, 14 September 2017 (UTC)