Talk:Georgian defense ministry announces return of military units from Afghanistan

Review of revision 4625178 [Not ready]

Revision 4625178 of this article has been reviewed by Acagastya (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 13:34, 28 June 2021 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not ready: See below NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: See below Comments by reviewer: Hi, @ჯეო:. Thank you for writing this article. However, there are a couple of glaring problems with this article. The first one being -- there is only one source cited. We need at least two mutually independent articles in order to verify the facts of this story. Second problem being ths style. Each synthesis article should follow an inverted structure. In short -- have at least three medium-sized paragraphs. Reserve the first paragraph for the basic 5ws and hs questions like what has happened, why it has happened, how or who was responsible for it. In the second paragraph, go in the details of the event. In the last, talk about the background of the event for people to better understand the article. Please follow this article structure. And it would be better if the sources were in English, I don't think any reviewer knows Georgian. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 4625178 of this article has been reviewed by Acagastya (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 13:34, 28 June 2021 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not ready: See below NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: See below Comments by reviewer: Hi, @ჯეო:. Thank you for writing this article. However, there are a couple of glaring problems with this article. The first one being -- there is only one source cited. We need at least two mutually independent articles in order to verify the facts of this story. Second problem being ths style. Each synthesis article should follow an inverted structure. In short -- have at least three medium-sized paragraphs. Reserve the first paragraph for the basic 5ws and hs questions like what has happened, why it has happened, how or who was responsible for it. In the second paragraph, go in the details of the event. In the last, talk about the background of the event for people to better understand the article. Please follow this article structure. And it would be better if the sources were in English, I don't think any reviewer knows Georgian. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Sources

@Acagastya: I have added some Georgian and English sources--ჯეო (talk) 11:19, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

@ჯეო: Please submit the article for {{review}} when you feel it is ready.
•–• 15:53, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Review of revision 4625581 [Passed]

Revision 4625581 of this article has been reviewed by Acagastya (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 17:23, 1 July 2021 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Thanks for the article, @ჯეო:. Too many lines were translated directly from the source causing copyvio problems -- I did as much as I could, to distance from the source -- please be mindful. Please go through the edit history, and whenever talking about the original statements, please cite the original statement. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4625581 of this article has been reviewed by Acagastya (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 17:23, 1 July 2021 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Thanks for the article, @ჯეო:. Too many lines were translated directly from the source causing copyvio problems -- I did as much as I could, to distance from the source -- please be mindful. Please go through the edit history, and whenever talking about the original statements, please cite the original statement. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.