Talk:Glencore announces Tahmoor mine in New South Wales to close

Review of revision 4220878 [Not ready]

Revision 4220878 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 14:35, 2 June 2016 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Not ready: Needs to be established; see below. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not ready: See below. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: This looks promising. Some things need cleanup: The lede should specify when the focal event (the announcement) occurred. Various claims and judgements need to be attributed/clarified. Where does the 350 jobs figure come from? "[T]he latest to succumb to the fall of global coal and community prices" is vague, therefore biasing without conveying facts; doesn't even explain the latest what, and even if one answered that, gives no sense of how much, how recent, or where the information might come from (which might matter; it's hard to say without knowing more). Although some very short paragraphs are okay, too many produces a bullet-like effect that interferes with article flow. Use {{w}} to wikilink key words in the body of the article. An infobox is desirable. If there's a suitable image available on Commons, that's desirable too. I removed the initialisms from the headline. I'm guessing those were the two major political parties mentioned about halfway down the article; but the Wikinews:Style guide warns against initialisms in headlines, the headline was overly long, and the Wikinews:Style guide also says the headline should "tell the most important and unique thing" but those political parties aren't mentioned in the lede nor even the upper half of the inverted pyramid so presumably they're not amongst the most important features of the story. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 4220878 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 14:35, 2 June 2016 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Not ready: Needs to be established; see below. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not ready: See below. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: This looks promising. Some things need cleanup: The lede should specify when the focal event (the announcement) occurred. Various claims and judgements need to be attributed/clarified. Where does the 350 jobs figure come from? "[T]he latest to succumb to the fall of global coal and community prices" is vague, therefore biasing without conveying facts; doesn't even explain the latest what, and even if one answered that, gives no sense of how much, how recent, or where the information might come from (which might matter; it's hard to say without knowing more). Although some very short paragraphs are okay, too many produces a bullet-like effect that interferes with article flow. Use {{w}} to wikilink key words in the body of the article. An infobox is desirable. If there's a suitable image available on Commons, that's desirable too. I removed the initialisms from the headline. I'm guessing those were the two major political parties mentioned about halfway down the article; but the Wikinews:Style guide warns against initialisms in headlines, the headline was overly long, and the Wikinews:Style guide also says the headline should "tell the most important and unique thing" but those political parties aren't mentioned in the lede nor even the upper half of the inverted pyramid so presumably they're not amongst the most important features of the story. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Pippyclarke (talk) 09:47, 3 June 2016 (UTC)Hi Pi Zero thanks for your comments working on them now.

If I add a mining info box will the image be inserted in that box?

Or, will I still need to include an image box?Pippyclarke (talk) 09:47, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

How do I change the lede?

Pippyclarke (talk) 09:56, 3 June 2016 (UTC)Hi can anyone help me, how do I edit the lede of a developing story?

thanksPippyclarke (talk) 09:56, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Review of revision 4221282 [Passed]

Revision 4221282 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 21:06, 3 June 2016 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: See the detailed history of edits during review. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4221282 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 21:06, 3 June 2016 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: See the detailed history of edits during review. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.