Talk:Leeds teacher fatally stabbed, 15-year-old in custody

Review of revision 2584586 [Not ready]

Revision 2584586 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 20:29, 29 April 2014 (UTC). Copyright: Not ready: See below. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not ready: See below. Style: Not ready: See below. Comments by reviewer: I readily found a bunch of fairly lengthy passages copied from source. Don't copy passages from source. Don't copy them and then "scuff them up", either, as this does not prevent accusations of plagiary. See the advice at WN:PILLARS#own. The headline asserts guilt of someone not convicted (or is that, not formally charged?). It needs to be changed. Neither lede nor body of article says when things happened. I see no 'day' words in the article at all. When is a basic question, so should be addressed in the lede, with further details later as appropriate. Note the advice, at the linked page on basic questions, about the appearance of a day word in the lede. You might want to check for claims of fact that should be attributed. We seek to attribute things to who said them when there could be doubt, or when there could be doubt unless one knows who said it (or, of course, if it's opinion). Wikilinks should use {{w}}. I fixed that for you. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 2584586 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 20:29, 29 April 2014 (UTC). Copyright: Not ready: See below. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not ready: See below. Style: Not ready: See below. Comments by reviewer: I readily found a bunch of fairly lengthy passages copied from source. Don't copy passages from source. Don't copy them and then "scuff them up", either, as this does not prevent accusations of plagiary. See the advice at WN:PILLARS#own. The headline asserts guilt of someone not convicted (or is that, not formally charged?). It needs to be changed. Neither lede nor body of article says when things happened. I see no 'day' words in the article at all. When is a basic question, so should be addressed in the lede, with further details later as appropriate. Note the advice, at the linked page on basic questions, about the appearance of a day word in the lede. You might want to check for claims of fact that should be attributed. We seek to attribute things to who said them when there could be doubt, or when there could be doubt unless one knows who said it (or, of course, if it's opinion). Wikilinks should use {{w}}. I fixed that for you. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Change of Headline

As according to the checklist below, the Headline of the article needs to change to be less assertive of guilt, so I'd like it changed to "Leeds teacher fatally stabbed, 15-year-old in custody". Thanks in advance. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by YingBlanc (talk • contribs) 21:59, 29 April 2014‎

Done --Pi zero (talk) 23:10, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Review of revision 2587554 [Passed]

Revision 2587554 of this article has been reviewed by Tom Morris (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 20:48, 30 April 2014 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Pi zero rewrote most of this and then handed it off to me for a second pair of eyes. It all looks good now. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 2587554 of this article has been reviewed by Tom Morris (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 20:48, 30 April 2014 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Pi zero rewrote most of this and then handed it off to me for a second pair of eyes. It all looks good now. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.