Talk:Luxembourg Prime Minister Xavier Bettel hospitalised with COVID-19

Image

Bettel was at the unveiling of a commemorative plaque to the oppression of civilians during the Nazi occupation of the country. It was said in the Commons file description. Images from the government web site bit.ly/3dH2UGs confirm this: you can even see him wearing the same tie! JJLiu112 (talk) 07:01, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Sigh, @Acagastya:. I keep forgetting to tag you, sorry. JJLiu112 (talk) 07:03, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

You don't need to ping the reviewer to see the talk page -- reviewers keep an eye on talk pages, and they cannot complete a review without reading it.
•–• 07:45, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

As far as the image description is concerned -- we do not trust descriptions on face value -- I can take a photo and the description may be factually incorrection, maybe due to memory hiccup, or even malice -- there is no way to be certain about it. Someone can wear the same tie at multiple point in time. That also is not sufficient here. If you want to include a fact in the article, which isn't common knowledge, cite it.
•–• 07:45, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

And while we are at it, ask this question: "Why is the activity/place important here?" Are we adding all the information just because we have it? Or does it somehow provide more imformation which is relevant? If two competing captions describe the same photo -- prefer the one which is simple, relevant and to the point.
•–• 07:53, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Review of revision 4626355 [Passed]

Revision 4626355 of this article has been reviewed by Acagastya (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 18:03, 6 July 2021 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Thanks for the article, @JJLiu112:. This was quite pleasant to review. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4626355 of this article has been reviewed by Acagastya (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 18:03, 6 July 2021 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Thanks for the article, @JJLiu112:. This was quite pleasant to review. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.