Talk:Margrethe II, Queen of Denmark, announces abdication

Some comments

Thank you for doing the review; a couple of comments about the unsourced things you found so far.

• For the royal family's popularity, here's a decent source I found. However, it may be better just to mention Margrethe's, since she's the subject. Or maybe it's unreliable since it's just a quote.

"Denmark’s Crown Princess Mary to become first Australian-born Queen" —  January 1, 2024

• I'm very sorry about the error with the whole "first queen" thing. I'm not sure how I missed the "Sweden" in Euronews.

Thriftycat (talk) 20:58, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Since it includes the number "80%" I don't want to go into the whole family. Also, there is current speculation that Frederik cheated on Mary. Better to leave the gossipy things aside. Well, I don't know what Euronews was thinking. At least NMWA had something to save it, even if it didn't name Margaret I. Cheers, SVTCobra 21:31, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Review of revision 4763290 [Passed]

Revision 4763290 of this article has been reviewed by SVTCobra (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 21:50, 3 January 2024 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Not sure if this is your first effort, but it is an early one and quite excellent. You have probably already read my edit summaries for the things I tinkered with. I feel like one or two of the sources may have been redundant, but I can't say for sure without going back over them. Anyway, as opposed to Wikipedia, more sources are generally not helpful unless they are used. This is a practical matter as it increases the work for the reviewer. That's about it. Thanks for the submission. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4763290 of this article has been reviewed by SVTCobra (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 21:50, 3 January 2024 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Not sure if this is your first effort, but it is an early one and quite excellent. You have probably already read my edit summaries for the things I tinkered with. I feel like one or two of the sources may have been redundant, but I can't say for sure without going back over them. Anyway, as opposed to Wikipedia, more sources are generally not helpful unless they are used. This is a practical matter as it increases the work for the reviewer. That's about it. Thanks for the submission. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.