Talk:Obama approval ratings hit new lows

Review of revision 1070346 [Failed]

Revision 1070346 of this article has been reviewed by Diego Grez (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 21:46, 2 August 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not ready: Words such as "disenchantment" represent a POV in my opinion. Change them. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1070346 of this article has been reviewed by Diego Grez (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 21:46, 2 August 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not ready: Words such as "disenchantment" represent a POV in my opinion. Change them. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Not when it's preceded by "According to a new USA Today/Gallup poll..." Benny the mascot (talk) 21:47, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Well, review it. Diego Grez ^{return fire} 22:00, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Review of revision 1070607 [Failed]

Revision 1070607 of this article has been reviewed by Benny the mascot (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 04:02, 3 August 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: Please see below. NPOV: Passed Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: "41% support Obama's management of the war in Iraq..." -- Did you get that from USA Today? If so, the 41% mentioned applies to a general job approval rating, not the specific Iraq War policy. " leak of over 90,000 confidential military documents..." -- USA Today says 76,000 It seems that you have a few consistencies in this article. Could you please ensure that all of the info you present here are backed up by your sources? Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1070607 of this article has been reviewed by Benny the mascot (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 04:02, 3 August 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: Please see below. NPOV: Passed Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: "41% support Obama's management of the war in Iraq..." -- Did you get that from USA Today? If so, the 41% mentioned applies to a general job approval rating, not the specific Iraq War policy. " leak of over 90,000 confidential military documents..." -- USA Today says 76,000 It seems that you have a few consistencies in this article. Could you please ensure that all of the info you present here are backed up by your sources? Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Article changed

It seems to me that USA Today has updated their article. It looks slightly different than before, and it says it was updated around nine hours ago. Nine hours ago, I was sleeping, and I made the article well over nine hours ago. However, I'll make the changes. --Shankarnikhil88 (talk) 14:33, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Review of revision 1071754 [Passed]

Revision 1071754 of this article has been reviewed by Benny the mascot (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 20:29, 4 August 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1071754 of this article has been reviewed by Benny the mascot (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 20:29, 4 August 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Categories

{{edit protected}} Please add this article to Category:USA Today and update the wikilink to become local. Thank you. Green Giant (talk) 16:44, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

Done --Pi zero (talk) 01:45, 5 October 2015 (UTC)