Talk:On the campaign trail in the USA, August 2016
Add topicReporter notes
[edit]- All statements from the Summary section are sourced from Politics1 unless stated otherwise (a list of what was used from there sent to scoop)
- Interview with William Johnson forwarded to scoop
- Interview with White-Genocide-TM forwarded to scoop
- Interview with Laurence Kotlikoff forwarded to scoop
- Interviews with Nicholas Hensley and David Collison were conducted via Facebook (transcribed below)
--William S. Saturn (talk) 09:53, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Nicholas Hensley interview
[edit]SEP 4TH, 2:49AM William Saturn
Was there a separate vote to make Michael Steinberg the party's VP nominee?
SEP 4TH, 9:28AM Nicholas Hensley
No the nominee picks his/her VP
SEP 5TH, 2:00AM William Saturn
was that recently added to the bylaws?
SEP 5TH, 8:30AM Nicholas Hensley
No, it was always that way in 2012 too.
David Collison interview
[edit]TUE 1:13AM William Saturn:
When were the bylaws of the Reform Party amended to allow the presidential nominee alone to decide the party's vice presidential nominee?
TUE 7:29AM David Collison:
They were not. However we opted to vote for a "slate" this round. But that only applies to states where our affiliates have ballot access. We can't force the candidate to place the same VP on the ballot in states where they run as an independent, for example.
Progress
[edit]Completed all but the summary. On first-pass source-check, have processed all sources but the feed. --Pi zero (talk) 05:31, 23 September 2016 (UTC)
Review of revision 4250366 [Passed]
[edit]
Revision 4250366 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 22:02, 23 September 2016 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer:
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 4250366 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 22:02, 23 September 2016 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer:
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |