Talk:Remaining US troops exit Iraq
Add topicReview of revision 1344265 [Not ready]
[edit]
Revision 1344265 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 05:19, 19 December 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer:
Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 1344265 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 05:19, 19 December 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer:
Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
- The above comments are precisely why I've had 'issues' in the past with use of VoA; they are most definitely not neutral. VoA is 100% funded by the US State Department, their material is not supposed to be published/available within the continental US. Why? Because, to be harsh, they're the propaganda department. Anything they publish on something as contentious and controversial as the Iraq War should not be used as a source here. My advise would be to completely remove all VoA material from this, and then pick a source or two that have not been 'friends' to the US government throughout the Iraq War. --Brian McNeil / talk 11:13, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
Review of revision 1344355 [Not ready]
[edit]
Revision 1344355 of this article has been reviewed by Brian McNeil (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 11:21, 19 December 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Due to using VoA as a base for this article has introduced systemic bias, the copyedits carried out do not introduce a suitable balancing viewpoint to counter this such to pass on NPOV. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 1344355 of this article has been reviewed by Brian McNeil (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 11:21, 19 December 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Due to using VoA as a base for this article has introduced systemic bias, the copyedits carried out do not introduce a suitable balancing viewpoint to counter this such to pass on NPOV. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Review of revision 1346238 [Passed]
[edit]
Revision 1346238 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:20, 21 December 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 1346238 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:20, 21 December 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |