Talk:Study suggests 48% of US soda fountain machines have coliform bacteria

Review of revision 934583 [Passed]

Revision 934583 of this article has been reviewed by DragonFire1024 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 21:43, 9 January 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 934583 of this article has been reviewed by DragonFire1024 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 21:43, 9 January 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Issue

The headline and the very first line are inconsistent; 48% of US soda fountains and 48% of US soda from soda fountains are two different matters. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:27, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Additionally, the study covered only 30 fountains in a single city (not the entire US, as this headline would seem to suggest). Additionally, this article fails to mention whether or not the soda fountains tested were all self-serve, or if this included both self-serve and non-self-serve fountains. Jade Knight (talk) 22:42, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

1. Nobody will be putting contaminated soda in the fountains - they'll become contaminated from the fountan.
2. That is how you gather enough information to obtain funding for a larger-scale study. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 22:52, 13 January 2010 (UTC)