Talk:Tasmanians protest against pulp mill
Add topicReview of revision 1231404 [Failed]
[edit]  |
Revision 1231404 of this article has been reviewed by Gryllida (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 13:06, 14 May 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Wikinews does not publish press releases. The event described is that survey results were released. This does not qualify as "news". (See WN:NOT) Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 1231404 of this article has been reviewed by Gryllida (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 13:06, 14 May 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Wikinews does not publish press releases. The event described is that survey results were released. This does not qualify as "news". (See WN:NOT) Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
- As of now, some of the sources are out of date and are not time-sensitive. They can be moved to "External links" instead. The format would be
==External links== *[http://url.com url title] *[http://url1.com url1 title]
--Gryllida (talk) 07:52, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
Review of revision 1231848 [Failed]
[edit]| |
Revision 1231848 of this article has been reviewed by Diego Grez (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 14:03, 15 May 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Try reviewing our WN:SG. While this may not be news IMO, the article needs, amid other things, the {{date}} template, which is fundamental in our articles; some more categories (I added one); several wikilinks (by example, Tasmanians should link to Tasmania, Australia should link to Australia, and so on...) Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 1231848 of this article has been reviewed by Diego Grez (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 14:03, 15 May 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Try reviewing our WN:SG. While this may not be news IMO, the article needs, amid other things, the {{date}} template, which is fundamental in our articles; some more categories (I added one); several wikilinks (by example, Tasmanians should link to Tasmania, Australia should link to Australia, and so on...) Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
There is one problem with the article. The news itself is the survey + the protest march. It is described only in one sentence at the top. The main two paragraphs that follow relate to the 2006 statement by AMA. In my opinion, the story needs more focus on the news event. --Gryllida (talk) 21:50, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
Review of revision 1232914 [Passed]
[edit]  |
Revision 1232914 of this article has been reviewed by The wub (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 21:28, 17 May 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Admittedly quite thin on the actual protest, but I see no reason to let this work go to waste The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 1232914 of this article has been reviewed by The wub (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 21:28, 17 May 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Admittedly quite thin on the actual protest, but I see no reason to let this work go to waste The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |