Talk:Telegram introduces bidirectional IFTTT integration

Copyediting

@Agastya Chandrakant:, thanks for writing such an interesting article.

I've reworded the article for clarity and to introduce the readers to the context better. As a part of that I had to add the essential 'How' question answer -- the changes were announced on the blog.

Some questions remain:

• "Previously, Telegram had introduced Telegraph a publishing medium and "Instant View"." To me this wording is unclear, I am not sure what they did. What is Telegraph?
• "The last two updates were available only in Android application." but this update is available for iOS. Which updates are you referring to? This needs to be made more clear.
• Which apps is the current update on? Android, iOS? What else?
• Did any of my editing distort meaning? Please check carefully.

--Gryllida 02:21, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

@Gryllida: I made some edits. They tackle the minor issues. Thanks for copyediting.
Agastya Chandrakant ⚽️ 🏆 🎾 🎬 🎤 📰 03:42, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Review of revision 4269015 [Passed]

Revision 4269015 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:54, 10 December 2016 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: The available sources on this sort of thing tend to be driven ultimately by the advertising efforts of the firm selling the product. It'd be valuable to our readers, though, if we could find ways to bring wider perspective to such stories. We have to avoid analysis, but the reader wants to know (or should want to know) how this compares to other technologies available or under development. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4269015 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:54, 10 December 2016 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: The available sources on this sort of thing tend to be driven ultimately by the advertising efforts of the firm selling the product. It'd be valuable to our readers, though, if we could find ways to bring wider perspective to such stories. We have to avoid analysis, but the reader wants to know (or should want to know) how this compares to other technologies available or under development. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

File:Telegram 3.15.png

I've sighted the above. When reviewing, don't forget to check the copyright status of images and sight anything locally uploaded if you're publishing. BRS ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 18:49, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

This software is FOSS. So, are the screenshots copyrighted? (The software has GPL licence)
Agastya Chandrakant ⚽️ 🏆 🎾 🎬 🎤 📰 15:01, 25 December 2016 (UTC)