Talk:Toyota accused of misleading public over recalls

Review of revision 963142 [Passed]

Revision 963142 of this article has been reviewed by Gopher65 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 02:54, 23 February 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Good synthesis article. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 963142 of this article has been reviewed by Gopher65 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 02:54, 23 February 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Good synthesis article. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Date?

{{flag}}

Any reason the Economy and Business category has this as 11 March 2023? JJLiu112 (talk) 07:48, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

Yes, DPLs use the date the {{publish}} was added to an article and not the date in {{date}}. I have never understood the technical reasons for that. Anyway, this article underwent a formal review but did not have the publish tag on it. I added it tonight. Look at my edit summary in the article history. Last year (or maybe two years ago) we had an instance where Cromium changed the tag from {{published}} to {{publish}} on an old article and it changed the date in all the DPLs. I do not know if it can be fixed. Cheers, SVTCobra 08:40, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

I see. Can any techy people work this out? JJLiu112 (talk) 15:22, 12 March 2023 (UTC)