Talk:U.S. federal judge upholds Oregon Ballot Measure 114 gun permit requirement, magazine regulations

Space vs nbsp

@Koavf, Good catch on the underscores in the Sister link. Thanks.

Your edit also included replacing some regular spaces with the html code for non-breaking space in certain cases of "Measure 14" and also dates. I'm curious why. Is it something to do with the number following a word?

Thanks again for the assist.

Michael.C.Wright (^Talk/_Published) 13:12, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Exactly. It's no bueno to have "July[line break]5" instead of "July 5". This is one of the typical uses of non-breaking spaces. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:30, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Interesting...I've never truly understood nonbreaking spaces. Very handy. Thanks. Michael.C.Wright (^Talk/_Published) 21:36, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Next steps

@Heavy Water, in a recent edit summary[1], you ended it by saying "Out from under review for now." That typically happens when the reviewer is allowing the editor to make changes. Are there additional changes you're looking for?

Sorry there were so many tedious mistakes for you to correct. I got out of practice.

Michael.C.Wright (^Talk/_Published) 14:03, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Oh, it was just because I had other obligations. No problem. Heavy Water (talk) 14:09, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Okay. Thanks. Michael.C.Wright (^Talk/_Published) 14:46, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Review of revision 4737950 [Passed]

Revision 4737950 of this article has been reviewed by Heavy Water (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 14:28, 20 July 2023 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: See edit history. I think many problems stemmed from OPB's confusion over the scope of the ruling — at one point it said Immergut "set aside" the permitting framework, but at other points it acknowledged she upheld it. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4737950 of this article has been reviewed by Heavy Water (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 14:28, 20 July 2023 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: See edit history. I think many problems stemmed from OPB's confusion over the scope of the ruling — at one point it said Immergut "set aside" the permitting framework, but at other points it acknowledged she upheld it. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.