Talk:US, UK, NATO to withdraw troops from Afghanistan

Objectivity[edit]

I realise it sounds bad out of context, but this is genuinely an example of the United States not meeting a set deadline, and has been used by the impartial BBC twice: "The announcement means the US will miss a May deadline for a pull-out agreed with the Taliban last year", "The US would miss a May deadline". It isn't used in scorn of the President. --JJLiu112 (talk) 04:43, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

not only that has a problem with future (what if plans change and they do it before the deadline? Moreover they are likely to, but have not missed it yet), anyone reading it would understand they will miss the deadline set by the previous president. And how BBC does things is different from how we do it.
103.48.106.85 (talk) 06:47, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. --JJLiu112 (talk) 15:08, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Review of revision 4615996 [Passed][edit]

Revision 4615996 of this article has been reviewed by Acagastya (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 13:58, 17 April 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Copyright: Passed
Newsworthiness: Passed
Verifiability: Passed
NPOV: Passed
Style: Passed

Comments by reviewer: Thanks for the article, @JJLiu112:. I could not find a couple of things. There are two concerns -- this article is a quote-garden. Other, a lot of quotes had their words changed. I don't know why, but I have noticed for a long time now. Please don't change the words of the quotes, it makes verification unnecessarily difficult.

The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.