Talk:US unemployment rate down to ten percent

NPOV

"There was a bit of good news for the US economy on Friday", that's real VOA-POV. Wikinews shouldn't actually, well, er... care. :-P --Brian McNeil / ^talk 15:18, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Fixed. Don't know how I missed that. Tempodivalse [talk] 15:19, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Wikify

{{editprotected}}

• Could someone please wikify the term Bureau of Labor Statistics?

• Done --Brian McNeil / ^talk 01:41, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

• • I meant Bureau of Labor Statistics, not w:Bureau of Labor Statistics.
• Could someone please change the category Category:Economy and business to Category:Bureau of Labor Statistics?

Thanks. Evrik (talk) 23:04, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

• Not done. Economy and business is an essential top-level category. There are no agreed-upon criteria for a category Bureau of Labour Statistics. I.e., should an article be in the category because they are relied upon as a source of data, or when a news story is actually about them. The two are subtly different, I'd argue for the latter interpretation, and you have tagged an awful lot of articles for administrators to review and make that judgement call on. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 01:41, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

• • Can you then add Category:Bureau of Labor Statistics as an additional cat?

Evrik (talk) 05:14, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

• I'm going to ask on the Water Cooler what people think is the appropriate criteria for inclusion. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 11:18, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

• Again, requested edit Not done. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 18:46, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Review of revision 919368 [Passed]

Revision 919368 of this article has been reviewed by Cirt (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 01:58, 6 December 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 919368 of this article has been reviewed by Cirt (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 01:58, 6 December 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.