Talk:United States Coast Guard: Possible human remains in debris from imploded Titan submersible

Title

Will most likely be changed. HushPuppie280 (talk) 20:30, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Indeed. SVTCobra 20:41, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

sorry... HushPuppie280 (talk) 23:33, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Competing article

Please see OceanGate's lost Titanic submarine remains found with passengers likely dead. Let's try to consolidate. SVTCobra 04:17, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Sounds fine! HushPuppie280 (talk) 17:28, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

merge both? HushPuppie280 (talk) 17:32, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

What if this article is merged into the competing one with it getting a new section called "public response" or something, since that aspect is not highlighted? Ulysses Grant Official (talk) 19:18, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

I think a merge would work? HushPuppie280 (talk) 09:27, 24 June 2023 (UTC)

Ixfd64, I've sent the other one — which was up for review, not under, BTW — back to developing with {{merge}} because you've updated this one. I can take a look at this tonight if it's resubmitted by then. Heavy Water (talk) 21:05, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

@Heavy Water: Sure, I'll see what can be merged from the earlier article. --Ixfd64 (talk) 22:17, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

Also, do we really need all these sources? Per WN:CS. Heavy Water (talk) 00:38, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

@Heavy Water: I removed the source "Coast Guard convenes a Marine Board of Investigation for Titan Submersible" as the other USCG article already mentions the 1-hour, 45-minute figure. --Ixfd64 (talk) 01:20, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

Review of revision 4734353 [Not ready]

Revision 4734353 of this article has been reviewed by Heavy Water (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 03:20, 29 June 2023 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: Well, didn't notice this: there's only one source mentioning the focal event. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: @Ixfd64. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 4734353 of this article has been reviewed by Heavy Water (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 03:20, 29 June 2023 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: Well, didn't notice this: there's only one source mentioning the focal event. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: @Ixfd64. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

@Heavy Water: I've added a second source, as well as updated the article to reflect the reports of human remains being found. --Ixfd64 (talk) 04:20, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

@Ixfd64: OK, now the sourcing is fine, but presently the focal event is divided between two events — the completion of debris recovery/its deposition on shore and the Coast Guard's announcement of the presence of "presumed human remains" in the debris (this also misrepresents the two events as happening simultaneously, when in reality the latter was several hours later). I would suggest just making the "presumed human remains" statement the focal event, which should be easy enough. Heavy Water (talk) 22:48, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

@Heavy Water: I updated the article and the title. --Ixfd64 (talk) 00:36, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Review of revision 4735578 [Passed]

Revision 4735578 of this article has been reviewed by Heavy Water (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 06:00, 5 July 2023 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Please see the edit history. I can't stress enough crediting images. And thanks for the invisible comments, they really helped. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4735578 of this article has been reviewed by Heavy Water (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 06:00, 5 July 2023 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Please see the edit history. I can't stress enough crediting images. And thanks for the invisible comments, they really helped. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.