Talk:Wikinews 2020: An 'Original reporting' year in review

Progress table

Progress

Section	Completed	Verified?
1.1	Yes	--Pi zero (talk) 14:59, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
1.2	Yes	--Pi zero (talk) 17:38, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
1.3	Yes	--Pi zero (talk) 17:51, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
2.1	Yes	--Pi zero (talk) 18:44, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
2.2	Yes	--Pi zero (talk) 19:38, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
3.1	Yes	--Pi zero (talk) 20:24, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
4.1	Yes	-- Acagastya (talk) 07:53, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
4.2	Yes	--Pi zero (talk) 01:12, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
4.3	Yes	--Pi zero (talk) 02:08, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
5.1	Yes	--Pi zero (talk) 02:31, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
5.2	Yes	--Acagastya (talk) 09:22, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
6.1	Yes	--Pi zero (talk) 03:00, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
6.2	Yes	--Pi zero (talk) 04:40, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
6.3	Yes	--Acagastya (talk) 13:44, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
7.1	Yes	--Pi zero (talk) 05:12, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
7.2	Yes	--Acagastya (talk) 14:26, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
8.1	Yes	--Acagastya (talk) 14:37, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
8.2	Yes	--Pi zero (talk) 15:38, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
8.3	Yes	--Acagastya (talk) 14:45, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
8.4	Yes	--Acagastya (talk) 13:58, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
8.5	Yes	--Pi zero (talk) 18:35, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
8.6	Yes	--Acagastya (talk) 14:15, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
8.7	Yes	--Acagastya (talk) 14:32, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
8.8	Yes	--Acagastya (talk) 14:06, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
9.1	Yes	--Acagastya (talk) 12:21, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
9.2	Yes	--Pi zero (talk) 19:24, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
9.3	Yes	--Pi zero (talk) 19:45, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
10.1	Yes	--Pi zero (talk) 00:36, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
10.2	Yes	--Pi zero (talk) 01:34, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
10.3	Yes	--Pi zero (talk) 01:42, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Reviewing

@William S. Saturn, Pi zero: This is just a wild thought, but, is it possible for me to review some of the summaries WSS has added, while WSS reviews some of the summaries I wrote, in order to distribute the review that pi might have to undertake completely, otherwise?
•–• 08:40, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

@Acagastya, William S. Saturn: I see no procedural objection to doing so. When noting a summary as verified, one should likely sign it, identifying both who did the verifying and, in case something were to be edited later, as-of-when. --Pi zero (talk) 12:43, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

In the table above, one can sign in the verified, if that is what we are doing.
•–• 13:47, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

@Acagastya, William S. Saturn: I've linked the section numbers in the table to the sections in the article. Sometimes Firefox (though not Opera, I notice) takes me to a spot in the article vertically just below the heading of the linked section (so, some caution may be indicated in that regard). --Pi zero (talk) 15:01, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Precedent

• "Wikinews 2014: An 'Original reporting' year in review" — Wikinews, December 24, 2014

--Pi zero (talk) 15:22, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Lede

I'm guessing the draft was a place-holder modeled on the 2014 article. However, our OR output pattern has been quite complicated, and 'increasing' didn't seem safe to say. I'm thinking, since it's short, meta-information, and I did keep my edit down to what was needful, I should still be safe for reviewing it. --Pi zero (talk) 15:41, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Review of revision 4598859 [Passed]

Revision 4598859 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 15:12, 1 January 2021 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4598859 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 15:12, 1 January 2021 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.