Talk:Wikinews Shorts: April 27, 2009
Add topicThe biased Judge story is pretty old - I think I might have to take it out if nothing is done with it. Sean Heron (talk) 22:05, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- It's several days old, well past the 2 day age limit for new stories. I went ahead and removed it. tempodivalse 22:06, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
Review and publish ?
[edit]I've not worked on shorts before, so whats the usual process? I'm lying already according to my local time if I publish this now, so I'd think it should be published soon. Sean Heron (talk) 22:15, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- Generally, we follow the UTC timezone for what date to use when publishing shorts - it's twenty after ten o'clock UTC right now, so the page should be renamed to April 28's shorts if the articles aren't reviewed within about an hour and a half. The review/publish process for shorts are the same as for a regular article. tempodivalse 22:23, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
Muchos Gratias for that information :). Sean Heron (talk) 23:05, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
Review - pass
[edit]  |
Revision 811315 of this article has been reviewed by Sean Heron (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:36, 27 April 2009 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: I'd have been good for more now :) , Sean Heron (talk) 23:36, 27 April 2009 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 811315 of this article has been reviewed by Sean Heron (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:36, 27 April 2009 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: I'd have been good for more now :) , Sean Heron (talk) 23:36, 27 April 2009 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |