Talk:Wikinews interviews Tyan Taylor, Australian goalball player
Add topicRe-using prior material
[edit]- This was an easy one to pick up the actual match report, pop it in related news, and lift a couple of paragraphs to give a slightly longer introduction. Goalball is probably still sufficiently 'alien' to most readers that rehashing the game's format is worthwhile, and mention of their earlier match leads nicely into the interview.
- Hoping audio and/or OR notes to be forthcoming soon. --Brian McNeil / talk 08:54, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Original reporting notes
[edit]- Found audio File:Tyan Taylor interview.ogg in a dropbox folder, targetted at JWS. Placed here for use in review. --Brian McNeil / talk 09:49, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
Review of revision 1610683 [Passed]
[edit]
Revision 1610683 of this article has been reviewed by Brian McNeil (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 10:21, 4 September 2012 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: I feel I've gone to the absolute limits of a reviewer's work on this. Adding content from prior articles; treating it, effectively, as a source seemed the best way to give additional context to the interview. I noticed Laura mentioning issues with her iPad data plan for dropbox, but found the audio for this in the Journo's Workspace side of the dropbox (already converted, thankfully). Uploaded, made what I consider mainly minor edits to the transcript from that, and have included the audio using {{Audio box 2}}. I also dropped the infobox so the image could be right-justified and avoid messing with the interview's layout. Can you please update whatever template you're using for articles to:
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 1610683 of this article has been reviewed by Brian McNeil (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 10:21, 4 September 2012 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: I feel I've gone to the absolute limits of a reviewer's work on this. Adding content from prior articles; treating it, effectively, as a source seemed the best way to give additional context to the interview. I noticed Laura mentioning issues with her iPad data plan for dropbox, but found the audio for this in the Journo's Workspace side of the dropbox (already converted, thankfully). Uploaded, made what I consider mainly minor edits to the transcript from that, and have included the audio using {{Audio box 2}}. I also dropped the infobox so the image could be right-justified and avoid messing with the interview's layout. Can you please update whatever template you're using for articles to:
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
- Removed the audio. We absolutely CANNOT have that online. The IPC told us when we did that in the media zone area that we could NOT use the audio in publication. It was only for note verification for writing in print. That was why it was put in JWS. the Zorn one was not there and not subject to IPC rules so could use that one. --LauraHale (talk) 11:44, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
- As I understand, such restrictions are placed by the organisers, which don't make sense. B'lore ComicCon had this written "ComicCon India has the rights to any photos taken here" -- and that is blatantly stupid. This does not infringe any copyright. At at the very least, it passes for FU. Thoughts, @Green Giant:?
•–• 10:28, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
- As I understand, such restrictions are placed by the organisers, which don't make sense. B'lore ComicCon had this written "ComicCon India has the rights to any photos taken here" -- and that is blatantly stupid. This does not infringe any copyright. At at the very least, it passes for FU. Thoughts, @Green Giant:?
- Removed the audio. We absolutely CANNOT have that online. The IPC told us when we did that in the media zone area that we could NOT use the audio in publication. It was only for note verification for writing in print. That was why it was put in JWS. the Zorn one was not there and not subject to IPC rules so could use that one. --LauraHale (talk) 11:44, 4 September 2012 (UTC)