Talk:Wreckage, victims of Air France Flight 447 found
Add topicReview of revision 1209107 [Passed]
[edit]
Revision 1209107 of this article has been reviewed by TUFKAAP (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 18:52, 7 April 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Being bold and ignoring all rules and publishing my own article. There's no copyvio, it's newsworthy, all sources are verifiable, there's no bias and the it's style correct. Don't like that I did it? SUE ME. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 1209107 of this article has been reviewed by TUFKAAP (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 18:52, 7 April 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Being bold and ignoring all rules and publishing my own article. There's no copyvio, it's newsworthy, all sources are verifiable, there's no bias and the it's style correct. Don't like that I did it? SUE ME. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Note to any independent reviewer: There is no impediment to conducting a peer review of this article. See WN:Water cooler/policy#Wreckage, victims of Air France Flight 447 found. --Pi zero (talk) 01:18, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Review of revision 1209823 [Passed]
[edit]
Revision 1209823 of this article has been reviewed by Diego Grez (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 01:22, 8 April 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: I can't believe you went so stupid for this. The article is fine. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 1209823 of this article has been reviewed by Diego Grez (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 01:22, 8 April 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: I can't believe you went so stupid for this. The article is fine. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |