Talk:Yemen: Former president Ali Abdullah Saleh killed in Sana'a by Houthi militants

@De Wikischim: this article is currently under minimal length consider adding more information.
•–• 21:42, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

I've just expanded it a little. De Wikischim (talk) 22:03, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

@De Wikischim: Just in case if you can not find more information, you might want to check Al Jazeera and/or Al Arabia. We need at least three medium sized paragraphs. Also, "who see him now as a traitor", "With Saleh's death, there is practically no hope left at all of short-term peace in Yemen." and "His death is considered a victory for the Houthi." seems like Wikinews is suggesting it. Opinions should not be in the article. These are the things which needs to be addressed, however I do not want to flag it "not-ready" right now, because it looks like you are online and might be able to address the issue.
•–• 22:06, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

These passages are just a summary of opinions uttered by others. They are not intended as opinions themselves. (I for my part have no specific opinion on this whole story.) De Wikischim (talk) 22:13, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

@De Wikischim: We do not publish someone's opinion. We can quote others, who has something to do with the story, but no opinions. Those sentences looks as if Wikinews is claiming it.
•–• 22:20, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

I've changed them now. De Wikischim (talk) 22:23, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Review of revision 4368832 [Passed]

Revision 4368832 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 15:05, 6 December 2017 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Small verification glitch: sources said civil war since 2015, didn't see them saying when during that year. Failures/gaps in verification (which are annoyingly often caused by gratuitous changes to source articles by the publishing news sites) tend to be expensive to review. A reviewer might choose pull the word "early"; as it happened, I considered treating it as "common knowledge", and noted our archives have news related to the conflict from spring 2015. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4368832 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 15:05, 6 December 2017 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Small verification glitch: sources said civil war since 2015, didn't see them saying when during that year. Failures/gaps in verification (which are annoyingly often caused by gratuitous changes to source articles by the publishing news sites) tend to be expensive to review. A reviewer might choose pull the word "early"; as it happened, I considered treating it as "common knowledge", and noted our archives have news related to the conflict from spring 2015. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.