User talk:Computron/Flooding and heavy snow cause widespread disruption across the United Kingdom

Reporter notes

The images are again the original reporting element. I'm also unsure if The Guardian source is really needed. --Computron (talk) 21:08, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

What you did was use information from the internet (a few sources and a few images which were already present online). I regret to admit that this does not constitute original reporting. It has to be original. --Gryllida^?? 01:07, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Licensing issues

I object to the use of ten images that are not uploaded under free licenses where it is unclear why we need that many images. The rationale for more than one free license needs to be better articulated on the talk page. --LauraHale (talk) 22:36, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Review of revision 1854478 [Not ready]

Revision 1854478 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 15:32, 24 March 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Not ready: See below. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: Could we have a bit of content in the article body that's specifically from the Guardian source, please? So this isn't derivative from the BBC sources. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1854478 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 15:32, 24 March 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Not ready: See below. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: Could we have a bit of content in the article body that's specifically from the Guardian source, please? So this isn't derivative from the BBC sources. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

It also occurred to me as I was examining the article that all the information had been gathered from the two BBC News Online articles and none specifically from The Guardian. --Rayboy8 (my talk) (my contributions) 15:34, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Review of revision 1854875 [Not ready]

Revision 1854875 of this article has been reviewed by LauraHale (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 03:11, 25 March 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not ready: Sorry to do this... but the sources date to the 22. This is not OR. The events date to Friday. Three days on and it looks stale. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1854875 of this article has been reviewed by LauraHale (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 03:11, 25 March 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not ready: Sorry to do this... but the sources date to the 22. This is not OR. The events date to Friday. Three days on and it looks stale. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 1856290 [Not ready]

Revision 1856290 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 19:35, 25 March 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Not ready: See below. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: Evolution of sourcing on this article, as I understand it: First review said not-ready because all article content was from BBC, none from the non-BBC source. An item of information was added to address this concern; no decision has ever been made about whether that item adequately redressed the concern, due to later developments. Second review said not-ready because no longer fresh. Article was updated with an item of new information to address that concern, using an added source from today. However, the added source was another BBC article. During subsequent editing to allow for passage of time, the one token non-BBC item got removed; perhaps it was too specific to be still considered relevant given the passage of time. Note, this removal would not have been a problem if not for the unfortunate choice to use yet another BBC source for the refresh. So here we are, once again with an article that (unless I've missed something) is based exclusively on BBC sources. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1856290 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 19:35, 25 March 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Not ready: See below. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: Evolution of sourcing on this article, as I understand it: First review said not-ready because all article content was from BBC, none from the non-BBC source. An item of information was added to address this concern; no decision has ever been made about whether that item adequately redressed the concern, due to later developments. Second review said not-ready because no longer fresh. Article was updated with an item of new information to address that concern, using an added source from today. However, the added source was another BBC article. During subsequent editing to allow for passage of time, the one token non-BBC item got removed; perhaps it was too specific to be still considered relevant given the passage of time. Note, this removal would not have been a problem if not for the unfortunate choice to use yet another BBC source for the refresh. So here we are, once again with an article that (unless I've missed something) is based exclusively on BBC sources. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 1856352 [Not ready]

Revision 1856352 of this article has been reviewed by Gryllida (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 23:53, 26 March 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not ready: Not fresh anymore. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: I regret to admit that, while you tried to "handle" the last review concern ("based exclusively on BBC sources") by simply adding two words and a new source, this way of handling it is inadequate. While we were bouncing around without doing substantial effort to rework the text, this news got stale. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1856352 of this article has been reviewed by Gryllida (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 23:53, 26 March 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not ready: Not fresh anymore. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: I regret to admit that, while you tried to "handle" the last review concern ("based exclusively on BBC sources") by simply adding two words and a new source, this way of handling it is inadequate. While we were bouncing around without doing substantial effort to rework the text, this news got stale. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.