User talk:Laurie1956

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikinews

A nice cup of coffee for you while you get started

Getting started as a contributor
How to write an article
  1. Pick something current?
  2. Use two independent sources?
  3. Read your sources before writing the story in your own words?. Do choose a unique title? before you start.
  4. Follow Wikinews' structure? for articles, answering as many of who what when where why and how? as you can; summarised in a short, two- or three-sentence opening paragraph. Once complete, your article must be three or more paragraphs.
  5. If you need help, you can add {{helpme}} to your talkpage, along with a question, or alternatively, just ask?

  • Use this tab to enter your title and get a basic article template.
    [RECOMMENDED. Starts your article through the semi-automated {{develop}}—>{{review}}—>{{publish}} collaboration process.]

 Welcome! Thank you for joining Wikinews; we'd love for you to stick around and get more involved. To help you get started we have an essay that will guide you through the process of writing your first full article. There are many other things you can do on the project, but its lifeblood is new, current, stories written neutrally.
As you get more involved, you will need to look into key project policies and other discussions you can participate in; so, keep this message on this page and refer to the other links in it when you want to learn more, or have any problems.

Wikipedia's puzzle-globe logo, © Wikimedia Foundation
Wikipedia's puzzle-globe logo, © Wikimedia Foundation
  Used to contributing to Wikipedia? See here.
All Wikimedia projects have rules. Here are ours.

Listed here are the official policies of the project, you may be referred to some of them if your early attempts at writing articles don't follow them. Don't let this discourage you, we all had to start somewhere.

The rules and guides laid out here are intended to keep content to high standards and meet certain rules the Wikimedia Foundation applies to all projects. It may seem like a lot to read, but you do not have to go through it all in one sitting, or know them all before you can start contributing.

Remember, you should enjoy contributing to the project. If you're really stuck come chat with the regulars. There's usually someone in chat who will be happy to help, but they may not respond instantly.

The core policies
Places to go, people to meet

Wiki projects work because a sense of community forms around the project. Although writing news is far more individualistic than contributing to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, people often need minor help with things like spelling and copyediting. If a story isn't too old you might be able to expand it, or if it is disputed you may be able to find some more sources and rescue it before it is listed for deletion.

There are always discussions going on about how the site could be improved, and your input is of value. Check the links here to see where you can give input to the running of the Wikinews project.

Find help and get involved
Write your first article for Wikinews!

Use the following box to help you create your first article. Simply type in a title to your story and press "Create page". Then start typing text to your story into the new box that will come up. When you're done, press "save page". That's all there is to it!



It is recommended you read the article guide before starting. Also make sure to check the list of recently created articles to see if your story hasn't already been reported upon.


-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 20:28, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Sofia Petrova Roberts Story: Lost Between Two Cultures[edit]

Please read and address stylistic issues within this article. You are new here and we want to help you report on this (and hopefully, future) stories. Please let me know if I can help in any way. At this point, the article is quite long and appears to ramble and lack focus. This might be one of those times where one story needs to be sliced up into multiple articles. Hang in there!! --Bddpaux (talk) 03:38, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Given the sources, the article would fail newsworthiness. The better thing to do is find sources published in the past 48 hours and work from there. Unless the story is refocused on a recent news event, then even breaking the current work into two parts will not assist in getting an article on the topic published. --LauraHale (talk) 08:09, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've merged the two versions of the article (under different names) into a single file with the edit histories of both. Mostly, that means that on the talk page there's all the reviewer feedback about both versions.

We really want to help folks who want to learn to do news reporting; but there are things we, as a project, are not —see WN:NOT— and one of those is, we aren't a place to write about the past. This article is about things that happened well in the past. When an article is published, it has to be about something that just happened (see WN:Fresh); once it's published, it has a permanent place in our archives, but it's an archive of articles that were news at the time they were published.

The article you've been working on isn't about something current, so in its current form it's not news and isn't going to work out. We're willing, as I say, to help you learn to write news and get it published, but the question is, what are your goals here? Do you want to write news about a certain kind of stories? Do you want to write news about this particular story? The broader goal is likely to be easier, but we can advise you how to proceed in any case — only, we'd give different advice depending on your objective. --Pi zero (talk) 23:07, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I too echo that it seems you're quite passionate about this issue. However, let me also refer you to WN:NOT. Many people (me, included) have certain "pet" topics. That's actually OK.....journalists who make huge salaries working for huge news outlets have favored topics also....there's no crime in that. However, your long-term success here will be built around your desire to function AS A JOURNALIST. If you have that desire (and just a tiny bit of tenacity) you can do many good things here. We report on FRESH news here. You may need to write a longform article about this young lady, her family, her ordeal....etc. etc. etc. That endeavor, however, might not function here. Feel feel to visit my talk page (just click the word 'talk')......you'll see below, next to my screen name....and let me know how I can help you in any way. One of my favorite mottos about working here (in terms of working on stories) is: Get it, write it, submit it and move on! That's what a journalist does. Having no intention to insult you here, I will ask you this about this situation: are you intending to report the story, or do you want to become a part of the story? If your goals are altruistic, there're many means by which you can engage in that, but those types of actions can sometimes create a sticky wicket here. --Bddpaux (talk) 19:08, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]