User talk:Tkfy7cf
Add topic
Welcome to Wikinews
|
Getting started as a contributor
|
Welcome! Thank you for joining Wikinews; we'd love for you to stick around and get more involved. To help you get started we have an essay that will guide you through the process of writing your first full article. There are many other things you can do on the project, but its lifeblood is new, current, stories written neutrally. |
All Wikimedia projects have rules. Here are ours.
Listed here are the official policies of the project, you may be referred to some of them if your early attempts at writing articles don't follow them. Don't let this discourage you, we all had to start somewhere. The rules and guides laid out here are intended to keep content to high standards and meet certain rules the Wikimedia Foundation applies to all projects. It may seem like a lot to read, but you do not have to go through it all in one sitting, or know them all before you can start contributing. Remember, you should enjoy contributing to the project. If you're really stuck come chat with the regulars. There's usually someone in chat who will be happy to help, but they may not respond instantly. |
The core policies
|
Places to go, people to meet
Wiki projects work because a sense of community forms around the project. Although writing news is far more individualistic than contributing to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, people often need minor help with things like spelling and copyediting. If a story isn't too old you might be able to expand it, or if it is disputed you may be able to find some more sources and rescue it before it is listed for deletion. There are always discussions going on about how the site could be improved, and your input is of value. Check the links here to see where you can give input to the running of the Wikinews project. |
Find help and get involved
|
Write your first article for Wikinews!
Use the following box to help you create your first article. Simply type in a title to your story and press "Create page". Then start typing text to your story into the new box that will come up. When you're done, press "save page". That's all there is to it!
|
Hi. You'd mispublished Hospital shut down by State of Florida (which I fixed for you) — only authorized Reviewers can publish articles. When a non-Reviewer puts the {{publish}} tag on an unpublished article, that doesn't publish it, and does move it to a more obscure part of the Newsroom (the "Articles mispublished" section). --Pi zero (talk) 13:06, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
- The article needs to have at least two independent sources. I've tagged it as needing that, before being resubmitted for review. --Pi zero (talk) 13:41, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
- Could you please define 'independent source'? Tkfy7cf (talk) 21:17, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
- I tried to explain a bit more what was needed in the second review of the article (which is below the first review — I did a double-take myself, when I looked at the talk page and saw the first review again). By "independent newsfeed" I meant that one source isn't just repeating information that it got from the other (which sometimes happens when, for example, several sources are just reporting what they heard from Reuters, or something like that). I did try to explain a bit more in that second review about the two-source requirement. I realize it can be a real problem, for a relatively local story like this, to find two independent sources to support a synthesis article; but that's what's called for.
- Note that I also commented on a sourcing problem for the last paragraph, and on the lengths of the later paragraphs.
- A lot of this stuff is in the "Basic news writing" section of the Style guide.
- BTW, by this time I think I'm a bit over-involved in the article myself to pass it for publication, so ultimately it will have to be reviewed by someone else — which will probably take some time, as there's often a longish queue waiting for review (measured by when the {{review}} tag is added). That's actually part of the reason I'm trying to be helpful in explaining about what needs improvement: I've seen first-time authors write an article, then it sits around waiting for review for a day or more, and when it fails review for something basic, there isn't time for the author to go 'round the review process a couple of times learning what's needed before the article goes stale and ultimately has to be deleted ("Facts don't cease to be facts, but news ceases to be news"). Of course, death by staleness might happen despite everyone's best efforts — it sometimes happens even to experienced newshands — but it would be nice if the cause weren't failure to help a new author learn what's needed. --Pi zero (talk) 22:20, 6 May 2010 (UTC)