Wikinews:Requests for permissions/Administrator/Gopher65

The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful request for adminship. Please do not modify it.

Gopher65

Gopher65 (talk · contribs) has been a great contributor to Wikinews since July. He has made over 1100 edits since then and does just about everything including copyediting, reviewing, adding new materials to developing articles, and is also a great reviewer. Gopher65 has created several articles but also has been involved in template designs. I believe the project would benefit by having Gopher65 as an admin. --PatrickFlaherty (talk) 00:20, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Questions

Do you accept this nomination? --PatrickFlaherty (talk) 00:20, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- He's on wikibreak, but it looks like he accepts the nom from this diff. ♪TempoDiValse♪ 15:29, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Yes, I accept. I don't return home until Jan 4th, so I may not reply until then. Gopher65_talk 14:38, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Question- If you successfully become an Admin, will you help out with admin tasks such as archiving articles older than seven days and Proposed deletions? --PatrickFlaherty (talk) 00:20, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I can be an anally organized person, so I would certainly help with archiving and closing DRs, time permitting. I can't promise I'd singlehandedly archive everything of course;). Gopher65_talk 14:38, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Do you currently, or have you ever, had the intention to take over the world, and establish yourself as the autocratic dictator of the world?Bawolff ☺☻ 01:26, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- If so, is this simply the first step? Bawolff ☺☻ 01:26, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - One of my long-held goals is to take over the world for all hyper-intelligent genetically engineered gopher-kind, stopping both Brain the mouse and Snowball the Hamster in the process. You should all thank me for this service (and bow). Gophers will be far more benevolent masters of the world than our mouse or hamster brethren. Gopher65_talk 14:38, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Comment - Three votes before user has stated whether or not they will accept the nomination - this should really wait. Cirt (talk) 01:44, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- User is away until Jan 6, so yeah, we should probably wait t'll he is at least here. Bawolff ☺☻ 13:26, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Agree w/ Bawolff (talk · contribs). Cirt (talk) 04:30, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    - Nom accepted. Cirt (talk) 15:04, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It's been over a week now since the nom. Shouldn't this be closed already? ♪TempoDiValse♪ 15:46, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Votes

Support as nom. --PatrickFlaherty (talk) 00:25, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support All hail to our new overlord Gopher65. Bawolff ☺☻ 01:27, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
TempoDiSupport^TM--♪Tempo Di Valse♪ 01:32, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom and answers to the questions. Cirt (talk) 15:05, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support no issues Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 16:14, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Narf! --TUFKAAP (talk) 16:36, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 21:19, 3 January 2009 (UTC)----[reply]

Closed PASS out the mop and bucket. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 15:59, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of the Admin's page or the talk page of the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.