User talk:TeaatUOW

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikinews

A nice cup of coffee for you while you get started

Getting started as a contributor
How to write an article
  1. Pick something current?
  2. Use two independent sources?
  3. Read your sources before writing the story in your own words?. Do choose a unique title? before you start.
  4. Follow Wikinews' structure? for articles, answering as many of who what when where why and how? as you can; summarised in a short, two- or three-sentence opening paragraph. Once complete, your article must be three or more paragraphs.
  5. If you need help, you can add {{helpme}} to your talkpage, along with a question, or alternatively, just ask?

  • Use this tab to enter your title and get a basic article template.
    [RECOMMENDED. Starts your article through the semi-automated {{develop}}—>{{review}}—>{{publish}} collaboration process.]

 Welcome! Thank you for joining Wikinews; we'd love for you to stick around and get more involved. To help you get started we have an essay that will guide you through the process of writing your first full article. There are many other things you can do on the project, but its lifeblood is new, current, stories written neutrally.
As you get more involved, you will need to look into key project policies and other discussions you can participate in; so, keep this message on this page and refer to the other links in it when you want to learn more, or have any problems.

Wikipedia's puzzle-globe logo, © Wikimedia Foundation
Wikipedia's puzzle-globe logo, © Wikimedia Foundation
  Used to contributing to Wikipedia? See here.
All Wikimedia projects have rules. Here are ours.

Listed here are the official policies of the project, you may be referred to some of them if your early attempts at writing articles don't follow them. Don't let this discourage you, we all had to start somewhere.

The rules and guides laid out here are intended to keep content to high standards and meet certain rules the Wikimedia Foundation applies to all projects. It may seem like a lot to read, but you do not have to go through it all in one sitting, or know them all before you can start contributing.

Remember, you should enjoy contributing to the project. If you're really stuck come chat with the regulars. There's usually someone in chat who will be happy to help, but they may not respond instantly.

The core policies
Places to go, people to meet

Wiki projects work because a sense of community forms around the project. Although writing news is far more individualistic than contributing to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, people often need minor help with things like spelling and copyediting. If a story isn't too old you might be able to expand it, or if it is disputed you may be able to find some more sources and rescue it before it is listed for deletion.

There are always discussions going on about how the site could be improved, and your input is of value. Check the links here to see where you can give input to the running of the Wikinews project.

Find help and get involved
Write your first article for Wikinews!

Use the following box to help you create your first article. Simply type in a title to your story and press "Create page". Then start typing text to your story into the new box that will come up. When you're done, press "save page". That's all there is to it!



It is recommended you read the article guide before starting. Also make sure to check the list of recently created articles to see if your story hasn't already been reported upon.


-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 05:13, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Looked at the article. Raised some concerns in review comments. --Pi zero (talk) 20:34, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm concerned about the way this article has evolved. As a reviewer, I can tell you that review is an intense task to do. That's true even with an article written by an experienced Wikinewsie who knows our policies, guidelines, and best practices inside out. It gets much harder with new contributors, who we do try very hard to help up our steep (but short) initial learning curve. We need our new contributors to move quickly up that learning curve, because there's no way our reviewers can do most of the work; not only would much of that work violate our review policy (a coauthor is prohibited from publishing an article), but reporters are always guaranteed to outnumber reviewers. (I strongly recommend WN:PILLARS and WN:Style guide; note our style guide is deliberately kept short on the expectation it will be read in its entirety). --Pi zero (talk) 12:37, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Unfortunately, hit a snag in the review process (when I finally got to reviewing — we've had a bit of a glut of submissions, the past few days). See review comments. --Pi zero (talk) 20:42, 27 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's no longer fresh, though. :-(  (To say that at length: review comments.)--Pi zero (talk) 00:56, 31 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiLeaks release information on Internet governance[edit]

Hi. I have reviewed WikiLeaks release information on Internet governance and marked it not ready for publishing. Feedback has been left at Talk:WikiLeaks release information on Internet governance. Please address these concerns or ask for clarification as soon as possible before resubmitting as the article is borderline on the freshness issue. --LauraHale (talk) 16:02, 10 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Hi there. Your recent article, WikiLeaks release information on Internet governance has not been edited for a substantial amount of time. In accordance with Wikinews' criteria for deletion, the article has been deleted, for Wikinews is only concerned with current events.

Please do not be discouraged by this deletion. I really hope you will continue contributing to Wikinews. As always, the guide to writing an article might be handy. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me on my talk page, or you can ask other contributors on our assistance page.

Thanks again, Microchip08 (talk) 10:17, 18 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I assessed this not-ready in current form; review comments. --Pi zero (talk)

Published. Thanks and congrats, to you and to User:Kad388UOW who also worked on the article. Article edit history --Pi zero (talk) 16:14, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]