Category talk:Australian Open (tennis)
Add topicLatest comment: 6 years ago by SVTCobra
- Nadal beats Raonic to reach Australian Open semis
- Kerber wins over Serena Williams 6-4 3-6 6-4 in Aus Open 2016
- Federer beats Nishikori in Australian Open's fourth round
- Djokovic beats Murray for fourth time, wins Aus Open 2016
- Amélie Mauresmo wins Australian Open
- 6-1, 6-2, 3-6 and 6-3: Djokovic beats Federer and advances to Aus Open 2016 Final
- Murray loses to rank 50 Zverev in Australian Open's fourth round
- Tennis: Andy Murray withdraws from Australian Open
- Roger Federer wins Australian Open
•–• 15:27, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Done 1 through 9 were added to the category. I sighted it on today's article. Do they really need to be sighted by a different reviewer? I would think an administrator should be allowed to auto-confirm the revision for such a straight-forward change, especially given the backlog of populating categories. Cheers, --SVTCobra 18:33, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
- @SVTCobra:only those who are reviewers and administrators can sight it.
117.198.177.83 (talk) 19:06, 4 January 2018 (UTC)- I know, but is it against current policy for me to auto-sight the adding of a category? It seems such a minor thing, but the template suggests it has to be a different person, which seems excessive for populating categories. BTW, you are not logged in. Cheers, --SVTCobra 19:10, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
- @SVTCobra: Usually, the sorts of curational edits that are small enough to be allowed to archived articles, including category changes, are also small enough to be self-sightable. (Although I have occasionally chosen not to sight a very small edit because I could see it was quite controversial, and I suspect a few times this tactic allowed me to resolve peaceably what could otherwise have turned into an edit war.) --Pi zero (talk) 21:04, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
- OK, I am going to assume that these are non-controversial and just sight them quickly myself. The articles are clearly all about this tournament. Cheers, --SVTCobra 21:16, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
- @SVTCobra: Usually, the sorts of curational edits that are small enough to be allowed to archived articles, including category changes, are also small enough to be self-sightable. (Although I have occasionally chosen not to sight a very small edit because I could see it was quite controversial, and I suspect a few times this tactic allowed me to resolve peaceably what could otherwise have turned into an edit war.) --Pi zero (talk) 21:04, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
- I know, but is it against current policy for me to auto-sight the adding of a category? It seems such a minor thing, but the template suggests it has to be a different person, which seems excessive for populating categories. BTW, you are not logged in. Cheers, --SVTCobra 19:10, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
- @SVTCobra:only those who are reviewers and administrators can sight it.
