Category talk:Australian Open (tennis)

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search

{{fill this category}}

  1. Nadal beats Raonic to reach Australian Open semis
  2. Kerber wins over Serena Williams 6-4 3-6 6-4 in Aus Open 2016
  3. Federer beats Nishikori in Australian Open's fourth round
  4. Djokovic beats Murray for fourth time, wins Aus Open 2016
  5. Amélie Mauresmo wins Australian Open
  6. 6-1, 6-2, 3-6 and 6-3: Djokovic beats Federer and advances to Aus Open 2016 Final
  7. Murray loses to rank 50 Zverev in Australian Open's fourth round
  8. Tennis: Andy Murray withdraws from Australian Open
  9. Roger Federer wins Australian Open

•–• 15:27, 4 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Done 1 through 9 were added to the category. I sighted it on today's article. Do they really need to be sighted by a different reviewer? I would think an administrator should be allowed to auto-confirm the revision for such a straight-forward change, especially given the backlog of populating categories. Cheers, --SVTCobra 18:33, 4 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@SVTCobra:only those who are reviewers and administrators can sight it. (talk) 19:06, 4 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
I know, but is it against current policy for me to auto-sight the adding of a category? It seems such a minor thing, but the template suggests it has to be a different person, which seems excessive for populating categories. BTW, you are not logged in. Cheers, --SVTCobra 19:10, 4 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@SVTCobra: Usually, the sorts of curational edits that are small enough to be allowed to archived articles, including category changes, are also small enough to be self-sightable. (Although I have occasionally chosen not to sight a very small edit because I could see it was quite controversial, and I suspect a few times this tactic allowed me to resolve peaceably what could otherwise have turned into an edit war.) --Pi zero (talk) 21:04, 4 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
OK, I am going to assume that these are non-controversial and just sight them quickly myself. The articles are clearly all about this tournament. Cheers, --SVTCobra 21:16, 4 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]