Talk:Cuba sentences USAID worker to fifteen-year prison term
Add topicReview of revision 1193439 [Passed]
[edit]
Revision 1193439 of this article has been reviewed by Fetchcomms (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:01, 12 March 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 1193439 of this article has been reviewed by Fetchcomms (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:01, 12 March 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Unpublish
[edit]I am temporarily unpublishing this article to address concerns regarding bias in this article. The article appears to presenting a sympathetic POV for Mr Gross which, likely, can easily be balanced in the existing text. - Amgine | t 23:22, 12 March 2011 (UTC)
- The diff clearly highlights speculation, and Mr Goss being misrepresented as some sort of charity worker. Sadly, the POV version is what would've been spidered by GNews. --Brian McNeil / talk 02:06, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
- At this moment, GNews doesn't seem to have it at all. --Pi zero (talk) 02:21, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Review of revision 1193464 [Passed]
[edit]
Revision 1193464 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 00:33, 13 March 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: All the edits were sighted. You should really have replaced the {{publish}} tag and left that to be sighted... The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 1193464 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 00:33, 13 March 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: All the edits were sighted. You should really have replaced the {{publish}} tag and left that to be sighted... The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |