Talk:EU launches channel on YouTube

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search

not ready[edit]

  1. first paragraph is barely intelligible
  2. don't use inline links
  3. please see WN:SG for help styling this article.

--SVTCobra 13:45, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

- ready - 1st para seems better now, the only problem might be the hyperbole in the last phrase - sexy materials - but OK in the context

? less sexy[edit]

Where on earth does the "less sexy" bit come from? We're trying to be serious here. --Brian McNeil / talk 15:49, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

- IMHO it refer to the the famost clip on the EU You Tube (art from BBC) - some treat it as light porn


Pls. improve it, to reach your standards. I do not see how to get better (and I'll be since now for 1 week off-line) -- Alexandr Snajdar 18:26, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

maybe better heading

Original reporting notes[edit]

...are missing on this article! --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 20:09, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Cleaned it up[edit]

I tried to clean this article up - see the edit summary. I would be glad if someone else could add some content to it, if applicable. Otherwise, it might need some more cleanup/editing.

This article should not have been {{publish}}ed! --Florian Prischl 21:38, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Good work on that, Florian. That was a job-and-a-half! I had a go at the sentence that was troubling you. Jcart1534 22:30, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

NPOV obsession[edit]

If you look at the original, it is not about wrong light porn as it described at the British article (taken erroneously now as a source).

It is just about the success of the EU programs promotion via video online.

But by the obsession of the NPOV, the resume of the most of WIKINEWS is just compilation or citing others news - and repeating others opinion.