Talk:Italian club Napoli appoints Carlo Ancelotti as new manager
Add topicReview of revision 4408885 [Not ready]
[edit]
Revision 4408885 of this article has been reviewed by Green Giant (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 22:09, 25 May 2018 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: The main issue is the translation of Laurentiis’s tweet. I would suggest going with the BBC translation. A smaller issue is whether to list the five top leagues. Feel free to remove them but I think it puts it into context. One final suggestion is adding a photo of Ancelotti - see c:Category:Carlo Ancelotti for a free one. Perhaps the one used at the English Wikipedia article infobox? Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 4408885 of this article has been reviewed by Green Giant (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 22:09, 25 May 2018 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: The main issue is the translation of Laurentiis’s tweet. I would suggest going with the BBC translation. A smaller issue is whether to list the five top leagues. Feel free to remove them but I think it puts it into context. One final suggestion is adding a photo of Ancelotti - see c:Category:Carlo Ancelotti for a free one. Perhaps the one used at the English Wikipedia article infobox? Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
- @Acagastya: I know you don’t like being pinged but in this instance there are things to attend to if possible. Cheers. Green Giant (talk) 22:11, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Green Giant: I am not a huge fan of archived photos, and that itself is not a sufficient reason for no-readying. As far as the translation is concerned, I would go with the club's translation, rather than BBC. Listing top-five leagues seem unnecessary if the countries are mentioned. I never said I don't like to be pinged -- and if I said that in January, that was for a very specific user. You don't need to worry about it.
•–• 22:26, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Green Giant: I am not a huge fan of archived photos, and that itself is not a sufficient reason for no-readying. As far as the translation is concerned, I would go with the club's translation, rather than BBC. Listing top-five leagues seem unnecessary if the countries are mentioned. I never said I don't like to be pinged -- and if I said that in January, that was for a very specific user. You don't need to worry about it.
Review of revision 4408904 [Passed]
[edit]
Revision 4408904 of this article has been reviewed by Green Giant (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 22:37, 25 May 2018 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: All issues addressed satisfactorily. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 4408904 of this article has been reviewed by Green Giant (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 22:37, 25 May 2018 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: All issues addressed satisfactorily. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
- @Green Giant: I am okay with this headline, though I would have preferred "SSC Napoli". But, I have been told not to rename articles after publishing as it creates multiple feeds -- wait for the archival process, or before review (exception -- there is a serious problem with the headline). Today, I saw this: first tweet => second tweet. Most of us don't even know who is has the login credentials. At times, I want to kick myself when I publish the article and moments later, I realise I forgot to rename the article. We really need to be careful about it -- the automation is not as smart as a human. (I hope I did not say that in a bad tone -- did not intend to, but maybe sleep got me)
•–• 03:18, 26 May 2018 (UTC)