Talk:MV Rachel Corrie seized by Israeli Naval Forces
Add topicReview of revision 1037113 [Failed]
[edit]
Revision 1037113 of this article has been reviewed by Griffinofwales (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 23:10, 4 June 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Revision 1037113 of this article has been reviewed by Griffinofwales (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 23:10, 4 June 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews. |
Failed: fix title, arrive where?
[edit]OK it was changed from New Gaza aid ships to arrive
- To New aid ships to challenge the blockade of Gaza upon arrival
- I have changed again to MV Rachel Corrie seized by Israeli Naval Forces Mrchris (talk) 12:44, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
Review of revision 1037461 [Passed]
[edit]
Revision 1037461 of this article has been reviewed by HJ Mitchell (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:47, 5 June 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 1037461 of this article has been reviewed by HJ Mitchell (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:47, 5 June 2010 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Repeated failure to follow the style guide
[edit]I was going to correct grammatical errors, source ordering and naming in this and re-sight it. However, when I look closely there are too many faults to do so in the time before I must leave for work.
Shape up people! --Brian McNeil / talk 08:39, 6 June 2010 (UTC)