Talk:Police shoot man dead after 'terrorist-related' knife attack in London

Quote farm

Right now, the article is nothing more than a quote farm, and we should try to be better than NYT in these things.
•–• 12:27, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

LOL. Yeah, I know. I downloaded source pages few hours after the attack. At that time, reports were scarce. Since now a day has elapsed, I'll find more ellaborate srcs and incorporate them in article. --Don't call 911 (talk) 12:56, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Done! More background info added. (I'm gonna see what clean up needs to be done before submitting.) --Don't call 911 (talk) 14:13, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Pull quotes must not be in the article if they are not present in the article text.
•–• 14:13, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Done! I will do preliminary fact-checking and then push the article for review. (You can expect to find me working on this for next hour.) --Don't call 911 (talk) 14:23, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Review note

I've done some review, but for external reasons am unable to complete a review at this time — I have to sleep sometime.

• Did prelim check against sources.
• Satisfied the image, image caption, and pull-quote are sound, subject to verification of article body.
• Addressed attribution, verification, and distance-from-source of the lede; struggled to do so within purview as an uninvolved reviewer, keeping in mind neither non-ready nor self-disqualification were attractive options. I'm pretty sure I've got the lede verified at this point (though I could easy seem myself rechecking it once more, to be safe).

--Pi zero (talk) 06:14, 5 February 2020 (UTC)

Review of revision 4545094 [Passed]

Revision 4545094 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 20:17, 5 February 2020 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Had problems with the lede, as mentioned above. Some further difficulties, on which see the detailed history of edits during review. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4545094 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 20:17, 5 February 2020 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Had problems with the lede, as mentioned above. Some further difficulties, on which see the detailed history of edits during review. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.