Talk:Quebec to appeal long-gun registry destruction to the Supreme Court

Headline

WN:Headline must be present tense, and describes the focal event which is something that has recently happened. --Pi zero (talk) 23:12, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, I changed will to to. Kudu ^~I/O~ 23:26, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Third paragraph

This paragraph makes mention of "billions of dollars" but doesn't explain how this economic damage could have occurred. Is it lost sales, is it cost of enforcement and maintenance of the registry? Can you expound a little on this? Cheers, --SVTCobra 01:32, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

I don't think there is much clear documentation on this. There is some, though, on Wikipedia: the consensus seems to be that it's related to government inefficiency. I mentioned the figure because it's often used as a catch-all argument by the conservative camp. Kudu ^~I/O~ 03:14, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Review of revision 1937895 [Passed]

Revision 1937895 of this article has been reviewed by Tom Morris (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 07:06, 29 June 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: The issue SVTCobra raised is interesting and it'd be nice if the article contained details of why the cost is considered an issue - but if the sources don't discuss it, there's not much we can do about that. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1937895 of this article has been reviewed by Tom Morris (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 07:06, 29 June 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: The issue SVTCobra raised is interesting and it'd be nice if the article contained details of why the cost is considered an issue - but if the sources don't discuss it, there's not much we can do about that. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.