Talk:Space Shuttle Discovery launches on final mission

Most OR information was gained from NASA TV under the multimedia tab on the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's website, [www.nasa.gov] during the launch coverage of STS-133 on the Public Channel. All other information, including Discovery's history, was found on NASA's website as well as Wikipedia. Tyrol5 (talk) 22:54, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Not sure that using Google counts as OR. — μ 23:10, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Well he wasn't using google. He was watching a live event on NASA TV. It's nearly the same as attending a press conference. We have for sometime used a live event like this or a press conference as OR, assuming we took notes at the time. I watched part of the pre-launch but had to go to bed before main launch. I would have liked for there to have been more detailed notes regarding OR though. DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 12:05, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Also noting that I took the photo of the launch from a friend's house near the launch site. JoshuaZ (talk) 23:14, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

That photo doesn't add anything to the story. 69.180.160.77 (talk) 05:16, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Sure it does. It is a piece of original work. I think he was really lucky to have gotten to see something like that, and I am glad that we were able to get it on Wikinews. Good work Joshua! DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 12:03, 25 February 2011 (UTC)

Review of revision 1185162 [Passed]

Revision 1185162 of this article has been reviewed by DragonFire1024 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 12:53, 25 February 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1185162 of this article has been reviewed by DragonFire1024 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 12:53, 25 February 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Glad to see that an article with 10 sources passed!

I am glad that that editors are not afraid to combine multiple sources, and that reviewers are willing to pass them. Good work! Mattisse (talk) 17:18, 25 February 2011 (UTC)