There really should have been some linked "synthesis" sources to verify peripheral information not covered by the notes, and to provide a sanity check (since none of us are perfect). Details entirely undocumented were that university are reigning and that this is their first win of the season. By poking around rather more than I probably ought I found, based on source links from articles of previous seasons, the Sunshine Coast Rugby Union facebook page from which I was able to confirm that University won last year's cup, that they agree on the final score of this game, and that of the three A Grade games for University they mention this season, the other two they say University lost. I seem to recall that the way the games are scheduled a given team skips some rounds, which all makes it reasonably plausible that it would in fact be their first win of the season; but this is the weakest point of the verification. A bit more in the way of documentation on peripheral points and sanity checking would be appreciated.
Sounds like a fairly exciting match.
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.
There really should have been some linked "synthesis" sources to verify peripheral information not covered by the notes, and to provide a sanity check (since none of us are perfect). Details entirely undocumented were that university are reigning and that this is their first win of the season. By poking around rather more than I probably ought I found, based on source links from articles of previous seasons, the Sunshine Coast Rugby Union facebook page from which I was able to confirm that University won last year's cup, that they agree on the final score of this game, and that of the three A Grade games for University they mention this season, the other two they say University lost. I seem to recall that the way the games are scheduled a given team skips some rounds, which all makes it reasonably plausible that it would in fact be their first win of the season; but this is the weakest point of the verification. A bit more in the way of documentation on peripheral points and sanity checking would be appreciated.
Sounds like a fairly exciting match.
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.
