Talk:Wikinews interviews RSL Australia for Remembrance Day 2021
Scoop
[edit]Forwarded to scoop. Should be OK after I receive images. --JJLiu112 (talk) 02:54, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- Refrain from review until I mark it 'OK', please. --JJLiu112 (talk) 03:14, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- Yep, of course, won't be reviewed until you submit it for review :) LivelyRatification (talk) 03:32, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- @JJLiu112: Would like to review, have asked on WN:Admin action alerts for a copy of your correspondence, but haven't heard back yet - would you be able to forward it onto me via the wn-reporters email on my user page? LivelyRatification (talk) 22:16, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- @LivelyRatification: done. Please click the three dots at the end of the email to see all initial correspondence. Disappointed by the delay, considering Remembrance Day is Thursday. --JJLiu112 (talk) 00:49, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- @JJLiu112: Firstly, very sorry for the delay. Secondly, this may just be an issue on my end, but I can't find the attachment with the responses, and I've checked to the best of my ability on the email correspondence. Deepest apologies for the inconvenience, but would you mind forwarding on just the email sent with the attachment? LivelyRatification (talk) 01:09, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- @LivelyRatification: done. Please click the three dots at the end of the email to see all initial correspondence. Disappointed by the delay, considering Remembrance Day is Thursday. --JJLiu112 (talk) 00:49, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- @JJLiu112: Would like to review, have asked on WN:Admin action alerts for a copy of your correspondence, but haven't heard back yet - would you be able to forward it onto me via the wn-reporters email on my user page? LivelyRatification (talk) 22:16, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- Yep, of course, won't be reviewed until you submit it for review :) LivelyRatification (talk) 03:32, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
┌─────────────────────────────────┘
@LivelyRatification: Done. --JJLiu112 (talk) 02:48, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- That has done it, thanks so much. Will get right back to the review. LivelyRatification (talk) 02:50, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Review of revision 4649438 [Passed]
[edit] ![]() |
Revision 4649438 of this article has been reviewed by LivelyRatification (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 02:59, 10 November 2021 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: A well-researched article on a timely topic. Apologies for not being able to get to this earlier, but great work nonetheless! The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 4649438 of this article has been reviewed by LivelyRatification (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 02:59, 10 November 2021 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: A well-researched article on a timely topic. Apologies for not being able to get to this earlier, but great work nonetheless! The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |