User talk:Jjbayes

Welcome to Wikinews

Getting started as a contributor How to write an article Pick something current? Use two independent sources? Read your sources before writing the story in your own words?. Do choose a unique title? before you start. Follow Wikinews' structure? for articles, answering as many of who what when where why and how? as you can; summarised in a short, two- or three-sentence opening paragraph. Once complete, your article must be three or more paragraphs. If you need help, you can add {{helpme}} to your talkpage, along with a question, or alternatively, just ask? Use this tab to enter your title and get a basic article template. [RECOMMENDED. Starts your article through the semi-automated {{develop}}—>{{review}}—>{{publish}} collaboration process.]

Welcome! Thank you for joining Wikinews; we'd love for you to stick around and get more involved. To help you get started we have an essay that will guide you through the process of writing your first full article. There are many other things you can do on the project, but its lifeblood is new, current, stories written neutrally. As you get more involved, you will need to look into key project policies and other discussions you can participate in; so, keep this message on this page and refer to the other links in it when you want to learn more, or have any problems. Wikipedia's puzzle-globe logo, © Wikimedia Foundation   Used to contributing to Wikipedia? See here.

All Wikimedia projects have rules. Here are ours. Listed here are the official policies of the project, you may be referred to some of them if your early attempts at writing articles don't follow them. Don't let this discourage you, we all had to start somewhere. The rules and guides laid out here are intended to keep content to high standards and meet certain rules the Wikimedia Foundation applies to all projects. It may seem like a lot to read, but you do not have to go through it all in one sitting, or know them all before you can start contributing. Remember, you should enjoy contributing to the project. If you're really stuck come chat with the regulars. There's usually someone in chat who will be happy to help, but they may not respond instantly.

The core policies Neutral point of view Cite sources Writing an article Content guide Style guide Reviewing articles

Places to go, people to meet Wiki projects work because a sense of community forms around the project. Although writing news is far more individualistic than contributing to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, people often need minor help with things like spelling and copyediting. If a story isn't too old you might be able to expand it, or if it is disputed you may be able to find some more sources and rescue it before it is listed for deletion. There are always discussions going on about how the site could be improved, and your input is of value. Check the links here to see where you can give input to the running of the Wikinews project.

Find help and get involved The Water Cooler The Latest News The Newsroom Articles for deletion Audio Wikinews Recent Changes

Write your first article for Wikinews! Use the following box to help you create your first article. Simply type in a title to your story and press "Create page". Then start typing text to your story into the new box that will come up. When you're done, press "save page". That's all there is to it! It is recommended you read the article guide before starting. Also make sure to check the list of recently created articles to see if your story hasn't already been reported upon.

-- Wikinews Welcome (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

The briefs...

...tossed around a bit, per my comment here. --Gryllida 22:33, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

There were problems encountered during review of the rearranged article; see review comments. --Pi zero (talk) 00:13, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

...and you also published it. Thanks!

I would like to insert a link to the article history here, through which you, Jibays, may want to go through to see how the article changed before getting published. (Some sources have two small letters, 'AP', at the top or the bottom, and they're the real author — AP — which I had apparently missed when gluing the two briefs together, at first.) --Gryllida 22:27, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Another political purge potentially underway in North Korea

My current concerns. I'm now hesitating to not-ready the article, because reviewers too dislike large number of review-revise-resubmit cycles (and, one of my concerns last time was a misreading on my part, which just makes everything messier and more frustrating for everyone); but realize, this hesitation could itself signify a problem for the article. If a reviewer expects to have to study the article closely and try to figure out permissible ways to fix problems with it, the reviewer will less often be able to invest in such a review, and the article will probably have to wait longer for review. --Pi zero (talk) 00:04, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Well, following my aforementioned concerns, and copyright concerns later raised on the article collaboration page by another reviewer, I took a closer look at the article, found that other copyright concerns were readily identifiable and at least one source was behind a paywall, and not-ready'd; my review comments, as well as my earlier concerns and those of the other reviewer, are on the article collaboration page.

The hope is, of course, that making mistakes and having them flagged out will lead to future articles that avoid those problems. --Pi zero (talk) 02:04, 7 March 2014 (UTC)